FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-31-2002, 09:01 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

Indeed, it is an ancient, country cousin to our own opossum, it's self a remarkable animal in that it is the only marsupial to be found so far away from Australia.

To be correct, it's the only species of Metatherian mammals (marsupials) to be found in North America. There are @70 species of marsupials in Central and South America.

<a href="http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/chordata/mammalia/metatheria.html" target="_blank">Metatheria</a>
Mageth is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 09:14 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

BTW, I think the naturalworlds.org website I posted above is an outstanding website.
Mageth is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 09:33 AM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 71
Post

Does anyone know where to find a picture of the complete skeletal remains that have been found? It's a really interesting find, but I'm curious what evidence the "pouch" theory of them rearing their young is based on, because as of yet I've not found a picture of such a feature, but rather most of the sites focus on the teeth and skull.
Beach_MU is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 09:41 AM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

The naturalworlds site has a section on the Victoria Fossil cave where many Thylacoleo fossils were found, and includes reconstructed skeletons.
Mageth is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 09:50 AM   #15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 71
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth:
<strong>The naturalworlds site has a section on the Victoria Fossil cave where many Thylacoleo fossils were found, and includes reconstructed skeletons.</strong>
Thank you for directing my search but it still doesn't answer the question as to what evidence the pouch theory is based on. Do any of you know of any?
Beach_MU is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 10:06 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA, USA
Posts: 212
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Beach_MU:
<strong>Thank you for directing my search but it still doesn't answer the question as to what evidence the pouch theory is based on. Do any of you know of any?</strong>
What do you mean? I would assume that they think T. carnifex and its kin (a handful of known species in genera Thylacoleo, Prisicleo, and Wakaleo) have pouches because a) all marsupials have them, since that's one of the key features making them marsupials, and b) the presence of epipubic/marsupium bones on one or more fossils. Anyone who's ever seen the skeletonized remains of an opossum has probably seen these little bones that stick out the front to help support the mostly soft-tissue pouch. The only other animals known to have them are monotremes, which I imagine a paleontologist can distinguish from marsupials.

However, I don't know if they've actually found the bones themselves, since the few pictures I've seen of full skeletons are pretty lousy, and I wouldn't be able to tell if those two little prongs were sticking out the front of the pelvis even if they were there.

- Jen

[ July 31, 2002: Message edited by: Yellow3 ]</p>
Yellow3 is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 10:15 AM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 334
Post

Thanks all for the info and websites. I'll get busy.
Starspun is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 10:24 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Beach_MU:
<strong>Does anyone know where to find a picture of the complete skeletal remains that have been found? It's a really interesting find, but I'm curious what evidence the "pouch" theory of them rearing their young is based on, because as of yet I've not found a picture of such a feature, but rather most of the sites focus on the teeth and skull.</strong>
See, e.g., <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/07/30/1027926885416.html" target="_blank">Aussie Site</a>
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 10:46 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Post

Thank you for directing my search but it still doesn't answer the question as to what evidence the pouch theory is based on. Do any of you know of any?

From the naturalworlds website:

Quote:
In 1966, a discovery of immense significance was made at Moree in New South Wales, where workers at a loam pit uncovered a nearly complete Thylacoleo skeleton which was missing only its hind feet and the tip of the tail. When the matrix was cleared away from the skeleton, it was found to contain the fragmentary remains of a pouch young (Finch, 1971).
Mageth is offline  
Old 07-31-2002, 12:47 PM   #20
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Wink

I never get any real work done, all because of Infidels.....
This thread led me to find <a href="http://www.press.jhu.edu/books/walker/toc.html" target="_blank">this swell site.</a> It even has the monito del monte, which has allegedly brought superstitious folks in Chile to burn their houses to avoid "bad luck".
Coragyps is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.