Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ

As has been challenged by DD, I have come up with a rational, creationist stance on kinds.

In the beginning, there were but several kinds: The bird, the plant, the fish, the insect, the mammal, the reptile, the lizard, the amphibian, and the snake kind--bacteria and fungi came in a second creation, along with viruses--they were introduced during the flood to get rid of the bodies and get anyone who managed to survive the deluge. There were very, very few variances, but not too many--and they all still could interbreed--but, prior to the fall, there was no need for this, so it happened only rarely. Thus Adam was able to name all of the animals within his lifetime--with only 10 or so, he could do it in the hour.

After the Fall, there was much more interbreeding, and as a result, certain traits came out and were expressed amongst different individuals. They still could interbreed, but there were more difficuties, so they tended to stay with their own groups.

The Flood changed everything. Completely. God realized then that it was impossible for homogeny to exist within a kind, lest one member corrupt the other. Therefore, after the waters receded, the caused the animals to multiply quite rapidly and mature rapidly as well. They went to certain areas where it was less crowded as the populations rapidly grew. As they did so, God altered them (this is not a "mutation", since those are not only always bad, but random in nature--God did some quick genetic engineering) so as to suit them to the new terrain that they inhabited, and further altered them within the kind so that they could not interbreed at all--making corruption across the kinds impossible.

It's all very reasonable and rational. Why can't you evolutionists see it?

nermal

message deleted.

Ed

Godot

So that's why pig and elephant DNA just don't mix!

Spaz

Then I must say that God's genetic engineering was a complete failure, we only have one ass!

Duvenoy

I have both an ass and a horse, and soon I will have a mule. I think I'll name it, 'Ham'.

doov

Duvenoy

But of course, J Tappin' C is right. Evolution is such a crock! It's a complete fantasy that takes a lot more faith than anything to believe in it.

Consider, God can do anything he wants and all of His creations are perfect! Well, perhaps He kinda wasn't paying attention when He invented platypoots and echididerms, but hey, even Eizenstine made a mistake or two, once in a while. Cut the Deity some slack, why don't you? After all, He had a lot of things going at the time. I mean, six days isn't a whole lot of time, but He did it!. All of the evolutionizers in the world couldn't have done anything like it!

What about dung beetles, hah? God created them to keep the Ark clean, and that's exactly what they did, both of them. Let's see some evolutioneering come up with that!

Yeah, and what about rattlemocassins? You can't tell me that these came from random chance, nosiree! Fangs on one end and a buzzer on the other is obviously the careful work of the Creator. He put them here to remind us that life may be short and filled with pain. The best thing to do is spend as much time in church as possible, and so avoid these creatures.

Evolution HAH!!! It is entirely unproven because it is not worth proving! Only the followers of Satan could accept such nonsense!

doov

Valentine Pontifex

I am sorry, but 'Ham' is a name for chimpanzees only.

Duvenoy

Hahahahaha! :notworthy

I didn't plan it, but afterward I started hoping someone would come up with that. Or failing that, the Bibical 'Ham'.

So, I'll name the mule 'Doofus', and cover the entire field.



doov

Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ

See, not one evolutionist can come up with a rational counter to my explanation!!!!

*god this is fun--maybe I should start trolling other boards with this drivel, and give WinAce a heads up to know NOT to use my stuff as CSTDT material*