FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2003, 03:25 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Default Check Your State Legislature NOW!

It is early in the year and many states are starting their legislative sessions for the year. We should expect that the evolution deniers will try to get anti-evolution bills passed into law.

So, if you are an American, it might be a good idea to check what laws are being proposed by your state legislature. Its web site is certain to have all current bills online.

This page links to all 50 state legislatures
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 01-31-2003, 03:47 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Default

Has anyone checked?
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 01-31-2003, 04:53 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Default

I get the Americans United newsletter Church and State, free inquiry magazine, and the Skeptical Inquirer. If one of these don't catch any new attempts to legislate creationism, I doubt I will be able to. Do you realize how much reading you'd have to do, just to cover new education bills? (And the bastids may try to sneak in their weasel words in bills which appear entirely unrelated to education!)
Jobar is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 03:33 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: ...
Posts: 1,245
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Valentine Pontifex
Has anyone checked?
I checked, trying out multiple keyword searches using the terms most often utilized by fundamentalists trying to sneak in creationism, and turned up nothing for California. However, I don't think this will be as much a problem in California, because we've generally had good marks for our coverage of evolution in schools (for example. in this Fordham Foundation report.)
Kevin is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 02:53 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Carcosa
Posts: 238
Default

Arrgh.

Washington has a couple bills to insert disclaimers a'la Alabama into science textbooks.

They got a favorable review from Slade Gorton (I would have expected better from him) for a bill to concurrently teach both some specific diety-less version of creationism and evolution.

Yah, let's waste even more classroom time detailing why ID isn't even science, let alone a legitimate alternative to evolution.
Hastur is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 04:38 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hastur
Arrgh.

Washington has a couple bills to insert disclaimers a'la Alabama into science textbooks.

They got a favorable review from Slade Gorton (I would have expected better from him) for a bill to concurrently teach both some specific diety-less version of creationism and evolution.

Yah, let's waste even more classroom time detailing why ID isn't even science, let alone a legitimate alternative to evolution.
I don't see these bills. I see some long dead bills listed, but nothing from the current legislative session.
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 02-03-2003, 05:23 PM   #7
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
Default

Texas doesn't have anything obvious on the stove re creationism - the concern down here looks like it's that gay folk might want some rights or somthing. I saw about three proposed bills that sound like that the bill sponsors don't want 'em to get some.
Coragyps is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 06:03 AM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Carcosa
Posts: 238
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Valentine Pontifex
I don't see these bills. I see some long dead bills listed, but nothing from the current legislative session.
D'oh!

I didn't realize the bill IDs actually reference the year they're from.
:banghead:

Should've noticed the big "1974" in the middle of the page, too.
Hastur is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 10:04 AM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond IN
Posts: 375
Default Indiana

Appears "clean" on evolution/creationism issues.

There are some "In God We Trust" bills pending.
beejay is offline  
Old 02-04-2003, 11:20 AM   #10
Tat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 72
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hastur
Arrgh.

Washington has a couple bills to insert disclaimers a'la Alabama into science textbooks.

This year? Harold Hochstatter (R-Moses Lake, for what its worth) introduced bills for warning lables every year since 1998 (probably before, but I wasn't watching the leg then). He is now retired. But we'll still have the fond memories:

Quote:
By Senator Hochstatter
AN ACT Relating to the teaching of the theory of evolution in the common schools of the state of Washington; and adding a new section to chapter 28A.230 RCW.

...

(8) The legislature finds that the teaching of the theory of evolution in the common schools of the state of Washington is repugnant to the principles of the Declaration of Independence and thereby
unconstitutional and unlawful.
(9) All textbooks and curriculum that teach the theory of evolution shall be removed from the public schools forthwith and replaced with textbooks and curriculum that teach the self-evident truth of creation.

SB-6500 2002 session.
His warning lable bills (eg SB-6058, 2001 session) actually got co-sponsors, but I never geave them a significant chance of passing.

Hochstatter was a real nutter on evolution. I've never met him personally, but from what I hear he is otherwise quite reasonable (for a conservative Republican).

For the record, SB-6500 died last year in comittee, just like the other similar bills he had previously introduced.

Quote:

[anti-evolution bills] got a favorable review from Slade Gorton (I would have expected better from him) for a bill to concurrently teach both some specific diety-less version of creationism and evolution.
For those not up on governance in Washington, Slade Gordon (R) (aka Slick Slade, Skelator), was formerly a US senator from Wasington. He lost in 2000 to Maria Cantwell (D), an internet gozillionaire. I'm suprised he made such a comment, since he was a US senator, not a state senator. One rule of thumb of politics is never cross a fence when you can sit on it. Whether he is personally anti-evolution I don't know. It would not suprise me though.
Tat is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.