FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2003, 01:17 PM   #131
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: surrounded by fundies
Posts: 768
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
We do have evidence for the flood, you just don't like it because it opposes evolution and the fundie science view of how the Earth formed.
You obviously have no idea how science works.
Flynn McKerrow is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 01:18 PM   #132
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

We do have evidence for the flood, you just don't like it because it opposes evolution and the fundie science view of how the Earth formed.

1) what evidence? I've seen what there is to offer, and am thoroughly unconvinced.
2) even if true, how would the global flood "oppose evolution"?
3) even if true, how would the global flood oppose the "fundie science view of how the Earth formed"?

So, I don't "like" the flood, not because it opposes evolution or how the earth formed, but because it's a mythical story with absolutely no supporting evidence that stands up to even a tiny bit of rational examination.
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 01:21 PM   #133
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

You obviously have no idea how science works.

Or calendars, or history/archaeology, or...
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 01:22 PM   #134
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: surrounded by fundies
Posts: 768
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth
You obviously have no idea how science works.

Or calendars, or history/archaeology, or...
good point.
Flynn McKerrow is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 01:34 PM   #135
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Default

Originally posted by Magus55
... the fundie science view ...

LOL!

Magus, are you going to answer my question, which I asked twice (three times now):

Who accepts your date for a "global flood"?
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 01:50 PM   #136
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

Or Egyptians didn't exist when people think they did.

Silt.
Every year the Nile would flood and leave a new layer of silt on all the fields surrounding it. It's what enabled Egypt to have a civilization at all, rich crop lands. Every year the Nile would flood, every year a new layer of silt. To find the dates all you have to do is count the layers. If there were years when the Nile didn't flood because of drought then that would mean that the dates would be older than they seem and not younger.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 01:59 PM   #137
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Ah, but Biff, all those silt layers were deposited by the Flood, you see!
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 02:03 PM   #138
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Magus, forget Egypt for a second. In light of the 4400-years-ago date for the flood you proposed (and keeping in mind that you claim mountains were "much lower" or maybe even non-existent then), how would you account for Methuselah, a 4767-year-old Bristlecone Pine growing on a mountain in the White Mountains of California/Nevada?
Mageth is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 02:16 PM   #139
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

A year under a couple of miles of salt water won't do a pine tree any harm. After all even the olive trees kept their leaves for the snowy white dove to pluck
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 04-14-2003, 02:37 PM   #140
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

A year under a couple of miles of salt water won't do a pine tree any harm.

Nor apparently the rise from around sea level to 10,000+ feet on the back of a mountain!
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:14 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.