Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-10-2002, 03:01 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 215
|
Interesting Gould quote
From the August 1979 issue of _Natural_History_:
"New species arise, not by the slow and steady transformation of entire ancestral populations, but by the splitting off of small populations from an unaltered ancestral stock. The frequency and speed of such speciation is among the hottest topics in evolutionary theory today, but I think that most of my colleagues would advocate ranges of hundreds or thousands of years for the origin of most species by splitting. This may seem like a long time in the framework of our lives, but it is a geologic instant, usually represented in the fossil record by a single bedding plane, not a long stratigraphic sequence." [ March 10, 2002: Message edited by: l-bow ]</p> |
03-10-2002, 10:22 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
We should keep in mind that he is referring to the time frame for the origin of a species. It and the parent species will probably be virtually indistinguishable.
|
03-10-2002, 12:34 PM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 215
|
hello.
|
03-10-2002, 01:01 PM | #4 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 215
|
.
|
03-10-2002, 01:04 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
Uh, hello?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|