Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-14-2003, 07:14 PM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,315
|
I took no hits or bites. Mostly I think it's just a case of if you read the question very carefully then you do fine.
I'm still not entirely sure what the correct answer is to the Loch Ness question though. |
02-14-2003, 07:35 PM | #12 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bloomington, Indiana
Posts: 188
|
What evolution questions?
And I got screwed on the "God can do anything" one because I thought they meant god could do anything logically possible. |
02-14-2003, 10:06 PM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central - New York
Posts: 4,108
|
The Few The Proud ... Oh Sorry ...
Hmm Honesty actually works :
TPM award winner 7.59% percentile .... I guess Therapy and medication does help (just Kidding) |
02-14-2003, 10:23 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central - New York
Posts: 4,108
|
Also from the FAQ section :
4. God is the basis of morality, but he doesn't choose morality. This is an objection to the contradiction that arises when people claim that God is the basis of all morality, but that she can't make good bad, and bad good. The objection is simply that God has an immutable nature, morality is a reflection of her nature, but because she can't change her nature, she can't change morality. Strange God is refered to as He intially then becames She |
02-15-2003, 01:16 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 844
|
1 hit, 1 bite.
Took the hit on the "evolution requires less proof than god" bit. Bite on saying God could make square circles--thought it was like the "Any thing that it would be right to call god" questions. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|