Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-14-2003, 08:59 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Posts: 152
|
Battleground God
I'm not sure if this has been posted before or if this is even the correct forum for such a post, but I thought everyone here might find this interesting (if you don't already know about it):
Battleground God Enjoy. Regards, AbbyNormal |
02-14-2003, 09:44 AM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SoCal USA
Posts: 7,737
|
That was fun. I took one hit and bit one bullet.
I was contradictory in that I stated that I required irrevocable proof for a god, but I didn't hold evolution to the same standard. The bullet I bit was kind of wordy, but still mostly consistent. |
02-14-2003, 11:31 AM | #3 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Alaska!
Posts: 14,058
|
Re: Battleground God
Quote:
crc |
|
02-14-2003, 12:08 PM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
I took one hit but bit no bullets, and was awarded the TPM medal of distinction.
It's great fun and educational. Rick |
02-14-2003, 12:16 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 2,209
|
No hits, no bites. Dave |
02-14-2003, 01:21 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 854
|
Took zero hits.
Bit zero bullets. Averages for the almost 90k people to have completed the test yield 1.36 hits and 1.1 bullets bitten. I won their medal of honor!!!! Yay!!!! I'm on a Mac right now, with MSIE 5.5, so I can't bogart the image link easily. |
02-14-2003, 04:58 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 602
|
No hits but bit one bullet
I was awarded the medal as well. No direct hits but one bitten bullet. And that one I would probably debate with the author.
Fiach |
02-14-2003, 05:15 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
|
I too made it through clean. (Hint- I expect it's easier to take an agnostic position than an atheist one.)
Some of the questions are not properly true-false, I think. I am sure that if allowed to expand on the answers, it would be easy enough to justify at least weak atheism. |
02-14-2003, 05:37 PM | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 854
|
Quote:
I was able to advocate the atheist position just fine, myself. As long as you say that absence of evidence can be evidence of absence, and that absolute proof is not necessary for belief, you can skate between the evolution questions and the deity-existance questions just fine. |
|
02-14-2003, 05:48 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mind of the Other
Posts: 886
|
Alright. I pretended to be a theist without getting any hits or bullets (not that I believed in it). I guess the theists among us might actually be consistent if they want to.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|