Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-24-2003, 11:02 AM | #31 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
Second, if you say that it is not a guide for morality, then you certainly can't learn any moral value from the stories in it. At least not in a direct way--the only way would be by applying it reversely, where you do the exact opposite of what the story is attempting to have you believe. And third, how can you say that Isaiah had a vision, when you don't even believe he existed, don't know if he existed, and certainly can't know that, even if he existed, that he actually had the vision. The only way you can verify the vision would be, if you had the same vision as well. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
07-24-2003, 11:09 AM | #32 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
|
Quote:
All right, I agree. I stand corrected. Quote:
I've never had a single vision in my whole life. All I have is blind faith. Quote:
I repeat: those who tell me the universe is an illusion might as well tell me I'm not really alive. |
|||
07-24-2003, 12:11 PM | #33 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
And yes, you are alive. Alive is only relative to this world. |
|
07-24-2003, 12:20 PM | #34 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
|
Quote:
So I may accept that the universe is an illusion on a purely technical basis (the crazy ideas that scientists dream up). But heaven help me if I behave according to such a conception! It's a real world, and I can't excuse myself stealing things because "it's all just an illusion". |
|
07-24-2003, 06:18 PM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
|
Emotional, I am a pantheist (well, an atheist/pantheist), not a solipsist.
What is illusion here is not that you *are*- it's that what you are *now* is all you are. The very atoms of your brain were forged in a supernova. One day, those atoms will be in a supernova again. In infinite time, those atoms will form minute constituents of stars, planets, comets, even life forms completely unknown to us here and now. That's physics, and unless *you* want to descend into solipsism, you have to admit the reality of that. I know, I know, you don't think those atoms are *you*. So tell me, just what are you, if not the atoms that build your physical body? You might say that you are the pattern which those atoms create, the human that is known on these boards as emotional. Is that pattern, not the atoms, you? Ah, but that pattern is ever-changing. So you have to accept that you are only 'emotional' until you no longer are; and just when did you become that person? Your consciousness is evanescent. Are you a soul? I would deny that, but I know Christians would say so; you say you are a spiritualist, so I expect you do too. So tell me, emotional- and you Christians, too- just what *is* a soul, or spirit? How do *you* know you have one? |
07-24-2003, 07:36 PM | #36 | |||||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
Also, we can choose whatever we want our characters to do. Make them aware or not. We are supposed to be made aware of this, but most, like yourself, choose to deny it, and live out the illusion that they are. I accept it, and also live out the illusion that I am. After all, what can I do? I cannot leave this world, if I die, I just continue on with the next phase of it. I never exit the illusion. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
However, I tend to believe that my consciousness will cease to exist (not sure that is the proper term) once my body ceases to function--at death. But then it will become existent or restarted once I am given a new body. |
|||||||
07-24-2003, 08:33 PM | #37 | ||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
|
The hippy who wrote that article needs to put away his incense, and open a window.
Quote:
Oh, and how many is "many"? 99%? Later in the article he reveals that it is a "small" number of researchers who actually buy into this stuff. These words can mean anything, but most people don't associate extreme values with words like "many". An obvious attempt to minimize the perception of this being a fringe idea. Quote:
Quote:
Still have to soften a word like "small", though. I bet if you try real hard, you can think of a commercial or ad which used this exact same softener. "A small but growing number of doctors are recommending our product for...." If the Guru who dreamed this stuff up convinced one guy, the "group" is "growing". Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And you only need to try and "understand how information can travel from the mind of individual 'A' to that of individual 'B' at a far distance point" if you're a new ager who swallowed the excuses of the "telepaths" regarding the "bad vibes" those nasty skeptics give off in their controlled laboratory experiments which they all failed. Quote:
Maybe his horoscope told him on the day he wrote this that he should "not worry about the details today" LOL What's with the Sleepy Skeptic Syndrome? I was expecting a scything response to this article from an Infidel who knows his physics. Among the first few responses! |
||||||||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|