FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-24-2003, 11:02 AM   #31
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by emotional

I reject the Bible as a guide for science, morality and theology. That doesn't mean I can't learn something from the stories there. I think the Biblical account of creation is false, but I don't think Isaiah didn't have a vision.
First of all, you said all [of] the Bible. This was in response to a quote by one of the other members. So, it would be safe to take it that you said that you rejected absolutely everything said in there.

Second, if you say that it is not a guide for morality, then you certainly can't learn any moral value from the stories in it. At least not in a direct way--the only way would be by applying it reversely, where you do the exact opposite of what the story is attempting to have you believe.

And third, how can you say that Isaiah had a vision, when you don't even believe he existed, don't know if he existed, and certainly can't know that, even if he existed, that he actually had the vision. The only way you can verify the vision would be, if you had the same vision as well.

Quote:
Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned Isaiah 6 as an example. I should have said: some people have visions of God. And left it at that. Or used another, non-Biblical example, such as Teresa of Avilla or Swami Vivekananda, who both had visions.
Well, whoever you mention, it is all the same. How do you know these people had the vision? Did you have the same vision?

Quote:
No one. I just believe it is true.
And I believe we are an illusion.
Milton is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 11:09 AM   #32
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Milton
First of all, you said all [of] the Bible. This was in response to a quote by one of the other members. So, it would be safe to take it that you said that you rejected absolutely everything said in there.

Second, if you say that it is not a guide for morality, then you certainly can't learn any moral value from the stories in it. At least not in a direct way--the only way would be by applying it reversely, where you do the exact opposite of what the story is attempting to have you believe.

And third, how can you say that Isaiah had a vision, when you don't even believe he existed, don't know if he existed, and certainly can't know that, even if he existed, that he actually had the vision. The only way you can verify the vision would be, if you had the same vision as well.


All right, I agree. I stand corrected.

Quote:

Well, whoever you mention, it is all the same. How do you know these people had the vision? Did you have the same vision?


I've never had a single vision in my whole life. All I have is blind faith.

Quote:

And I believe we are an illusion.
Yet the pain is real enough. An illusion, but with such a good impression of being real. Perhaps real after all? Or a real illusion? A contradiction in terms?

I repeat: those who tell me the universe is an illusion might as well tell me I'm not really alive.
emotional is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 12:11 PM   #33
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by emotional

Yet the pain is real enough. An illusion, but with such a good impression of being real. Perhaps real after all? Or a real illusion? A contradiction in terms?

I repeat: those who tell me the universe is an illusion might as well tell me I'm not really alive.
A reality within the illusion...in other words, its all part of the illusion.

And yes, you are alive. Alive is only relative to this world.
Milton is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 12:20 PM   #34
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Milton
A reality within the illusion...in other words, its all part of the illusion.
Then the word "illusion" has no practical meaning. In a real illusion, like those we create as films, the characters are unconscious of their being an illusion. This world is the only "illusion" in which the characters are conscious of playing the game. In a film, you can't have one of the characters jump out freely doing what he wants - all play a predefined script. What makes the real world real is that we're not playing a predefined script. I can't just, when encountering something that doesn't please me in the real world, protest loudly and say, "hey! Change the script!", because there is no script - it's all real and not a play, not an illusion!

So I may accept that the universe is an illusion on a purely technical basis (the crazy ideas that scientists dream up). But heaven help me if I behave according to such a conception! It's a real world, and I can't excuse myself stealing things because "it's all just an illusion".
emotional is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 06:18 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Default

Emotional, I am a pantheist (well, an atheist/pantheist), not a solipsist.

What is illusion here is not that you *are*- it's that what you are *now* is all you are.

The very atoms of your brain were forged in a supernova. One day, those atoms will be in a supernova again. In infinite time, those atoms will form minute constituents of stars, planets, comets, even life forms completely unknown to us here and now. That's physics, and unless *you* want to descend into solipsism, you have to admit the reality of that.

I know, I know, you don't think those atoms are *you*. So tell me, just what are you, if not the atoms that build your physical body?

You might say that you are the pattern which those atoms create, the human that is known on these boards as emotional. Is that pattern, not the atoms, you?

Ah, but that pattern is ever-changing. So you have to accept that you are only 'emotional' until you no longer are; and just when did you become that person? Your consciousness is evanescent.

Are you a soul? I would deny that, but I know Christians would say so; you say you are a spiritualist, so I expect you do too.

So tell me, emotional- and you Christians, too- just what *is* a soul, or spirit? How do *you* know you have one?
Jobar is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 07:36 PM   #36
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta,GA,USA
Posts: 172
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by emotional
Then the word "illusion" has no practical meaning. In a real illusion, like those we create as films, the characters are unconscious of their being an illusion.
Normally, but not always. I mean, there have been some films where the characters are made to stop whatever they are doing, and look at the camera and start talking to us as if they knew we were there.

Also, we can choose whatever we want our characters to do. Make them aware or not. We are supposed to be made aware of this, but most, like yourself, choose to deny it, and live out the illusion that they are. I accept it, and also live out the illusion that I am. After all, what can I do? I cannot leave this world, if I die, I just continue on with the next phase of it. I never exit the illusion.

Quote:
This world is the only "illusion" in which the characters are conscious of playing the game. In a film, you can't have one of the characters jump out freely doing what he wants - all play a predefined script.
Exactly, they are all predefined scripts.

Quote:
What makes the real world real is that we're not playing a predefined script.
Of course we are.

Quote:
I can't just, when encountering something that doesn't please me in the real world, protest loudly and say, "hey! Change the script!", because there is no script - it's all real and not a play, not an illusion!
Of course you can't make God change it. You just can't escape it.

Quote:
So I may accept that the universe is an illusion on a purely technical basis (the crazy ideas that scientists dream up). But heaven help me if I behave according to such a conception!
I don't believe you need to know that you are an illusion, in order for you to know how to behave in this world. But it sure helps me deal with things a lot better. I mean, I conform to whatever God sends my way. It is His choice, I can do nothing but make the best out of it for myself.

Quote:
It's a real world, and I can't excuse myself stealing things because "it's all just an illusion".
Well, you can say that it is all an illusion, but then you will also have the illusion of being in jail for stealing. It is all part of the illusion.

Quote:
Jobar said

So tell me, emotional- and you Christians, too- just what *is* a soul, or spirit? How do *you* know you have one?
I am a soul. While in this life, I am composed of both body and spirit. The spirit is the force that gives life to the body. Though consciousness in this life is, in a way, affected by the physical, it is also able to exist without the body.

However, I tend to believe that my consciousness will cease to exist (not sure that is the proper term) once my body ceases to function--at death. But then it will become existent or restarted once I am given a new body.
Milton is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 08:33 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
Thumbs down

The hippy who wrote that article needs to put away his incense, and open a window.

Quote:
This striking new picture of reality, the synthesis of Bohm and Pribram's views, has come to be called the holographic paradigm, and although many scientists have greeted it with skepticism,........
LOL This is an obvious euphemism for "laughed their asses off at us". Like those close-minded fools did to Mr Timecube,

Oh, and how many is "many"? 99%? Later in the article he reveals that it is a "small" number of researchers who actually buy into this stuff.

These words can mean anything, but most people don't associate extreme values with words like "many". An obvious attempt to minimize the perception of this being a fringe idea.

Quote:
it has galvanized others.
Yeah, I bet. We all know how people get in matters of faith.....

Quote:
A small but growing group of researchers
This cracked me up. Textbook persuasion, folks. How small is "small". I'll bet dollars to donuts it is a hell of a lot smaller than the proportions people tend to associate with the word "small" automatically.

Still have to soften a word like "small", though. I bet if you try real hard, you can think of a commercial or ad which used this exact same softener. "A small but growing number of doctors are recommending our product for...."

If the Guru who dreamed this stuff up convinced one guy, the "group" is "growing".

Quote:
believe it may be the most accurate model of reality science has arrived at thus far. More than that, some believe it may solve some mysteries that have never before been explainable by science and even establish the paranormal as a part of nature.
Presupposing that there are actual paranormal phenomena to begin with!

Quote:
Numerous researchers, including Bohm and Pribram, have noted that many para-psychological phenomena become much more understandable in terms of the holographic paradigm.
Since when were there confirmed "para-psychological phenomena" in need of further understanding?

Quote:
In a universe in which individual brains are actually indivisible portions of the greater hologram and everything is infinitely interconnected, telepathy may merely be the accessing of the holographic level.
ROFLMAO. First of all, the supposed "telepaths" all failed miserably when tested in laboratory conditions. There is no need to search for an explanation for telepathy.




Quote:
It is obviously much easier to understand how information can travel from the mind of individual 'A' to that of individual 'B' at a far distance point and helps to understand a number of unsolved puzzles in psychology.
Puzzles such as???????

And you only need to try and "understand how information can travel from the mind of individual 'A' to that of individual 'B' at a far distance point" if you're a new ager who swallowed the excuses of the "telepaths" regarding the "bad vibes" those nasty skeptics give off in their controlled laboratory experiments which they all failed.

Quote:
In particular, Grof feels the holographic paradigm offers a model for understanding many of the baffling phenomena experienced by individuals during altered states of consciousness.
Once again, with no hint as to what "baffling phenomena" he is referring to.

Maybe his horoscope told him on the day he wrote this that he should "not worry about the details today" LOL

What's with the Sleepy Skeptic Syndrome? I was expecting a scything response to this article from an Infidel who knows his physics. Among the first few responses!
Bible Humper is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.