Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Principia · 07-19-2002, 12:09 PM

Check out the ARN scene, as the IDists (ah, always one letter shy of what I really want to call them) build a case on the suspected return of a previously banned member, <a href="http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=13;t=000202" target="_blank">here</a>.

The reason why DH is being persecuted? Because he had the audacity to stand up to MG and PLA on more than one occasion and challenge their intellect.

[ July 19, 2002: Message edited by: Scientiae ]</p>

pangloss · 07-19-2002, 02:59 PM

Gee - and Rick Pierson (aka DNAunion) is involved?

I'm shocked!

pangloss · 07-19-2002, 03:05 PM

If the use of terminology and 'attitude' are good indicators of identity, then I suggest the following:

mb=nobody=creationist=quicksilver

And Leonard getting in on it - what a dork. His "25 years as a linguist" came up short when he tried to claim that I was you (or was it you are me?)...

Well, they have no actual science to discuss, so all they have is to blabber on about their paranoid obsessive delusions...

pangloss · 07-19-2002, 03:08 PM

Oh - and somebody might want to point out to "Bard" in this thread:
<a href="http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=13;t=000191" target="_blank">http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=13;t=000191</a>
that back-pats from ID fellows isn't really support from "within the scientific comunity"...

pangloss · 07-19-2002, 03:12 PM

Wow - ARn is like bad acid...

PLA said "Stop being a critic: try being creative"

Now THAT is a classic case of projection if I ever saw one!

Principia · 07-19-2002, 04:09 PM

The greatest part about the thread linked above was Mike Gene's passionate plea for a ban. Something to the effect of "enforce a rule or it becomes worthless." LOL! The whole week saw IDists turn nasty, with the 'big guns' (PLA, MG, and DNA) taking turns picking at their critics. And right there is their own Rule #2 which explicity stated that ad homs were not to be tolerated.

The hypocrisy there is incredible.

Yeah, for all intents and purposes, leonard = nobody = Quicksilver = mb = Bard on that board. When they try to say something on the general board, they consistently get either shot down, humiliated, or ignored. So, they go back to congratulating themselves on how stupid they are in the infamous Humo(u)r forum.

[ July 19, 2002: Message edited by: Scientiae ]</p>

Dr.GH · 07-20-2002, 10:46 AM

Is there any question in anyones mind that RFH is Roland F. Hirsch?

I've also noticed that the tone is getting hostile, but I have become much less patient with IDiots as well.

Principia · 07-20-2002, 01:06 PM

Dr. GH:

The general consensus (much like what the morons are going by about the DH=Wolf=Julie thread) is that RFH in fact is Ronald Hirsch. But, Scott would have a better idea (e.g. <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=000864&p=" target="_blank">here</a>).

Well, I must remember now that a prerequisite to being an IDist is to be versed in pseudo-linguistics to analyze your opponent...

MrDarwin · 07-20-2002, 02:47 PM

I haven't been following things on ARN lately. I thought Mike Gene had quit the board?

Principia · 07-20-2002, 02:58 PM

Nope, MG's back with a vengeance, mocking, psychoanalyzing, complaining, and evading, as usual. He's also adopted DNAUnion as his pet bloodhound. There's not much at ARN these days because, once again, the Moderator has slacked in his duties.

07-19-2002, 12:09 PM	#1
Principia Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: anywhere Posts: 1,976	If you thought BB environment was hostile... Check out the ARN scene, as the IDists (ah, always one letter shy of what I really want to call them) build a case on the suspected return of a previously banned member, <a href="http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=13;t=000202" target="_blank">here</a>. The reason why DH is being persecuted? Because he had the audacity to stand up to MG and PLA on more than one occasion and challenge their intellect. [ July 19, 2002: Message edited by: Scientiae ]</p>

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

07-19-2002, 02:59 PM	#2
pangloss Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2000 Posts: 1,302	Gee - and Rick Pierson (aka DNAunion) is involved? I'm shocked!

07-19-2002, 03:05 PM	#3
pangloss Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2000 Posts: 1,302	If the use of terminology and 'attitude' are good indicators of identity, then I suggest the following: mb=nobody=creationist=quicksilver And Leonard getting in on it - what a dork. His "25 years as a linguist" came up short when he tried to claim that I was you (or was it you are me?)... Well, they have no actual science to discuss, so all they have is to blabber on about their paranoid obsessive delusions...

07-19-2002, 03:08 PM	#4
pangloss Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2000 Posts: 1,302	Oh - and somebody might want to point out to "Bard" in this thread: <a href="http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=13;t=000191" target="_blank">http://www.arn.org/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=13;t=000191</a> that back-pats from ID fellows isn't really support from "within the scientific comunity"...

07-19-2002, 03:12 PM	#5
pangloss Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2000 Posts: 1,302	Wow - ARn is like bad acid... PLA said "Stop being a critic: try being creative" Now THAT is a classic case of projection if I ever saw one!

07-19-2002, 04:09 PM	#6
Principia Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: anywhere Posts: 1,976	The greatest part about the thread linked above was Mike Gene's passionate plea for a ban. Something to the effect of "enforce a rule or it becomes worthless." LOL! The whole week saw IDists turn nasty, with the 'big guns' (PLA, MG, and DNA) taking turns picking at their critics. And right there is their own Rule #2 which explicity stated that ad homs were not to be tolerated. The hypocrisy there is incredible. Yeah, for all intents and purposes, leonard = nobody = Quicksilver = mb = Bard on that board. When they try to say something on the general board, they consistently get either shot down, humiliated, or ignored. So, they go back to congratulating themselves on how stupid they are in the infamous Humo(u)r forum. [ July 19, 2002: Message edited by: Scientiae ]</p>

07-20-2002, 10:46 AM	#7
Dr.GH Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA Posts: 2,115	Is there any question in anyones mind that RFH is Roland F. Hirsch? I've also noticed that the tone is getting hostile, but I have become much less patient with IDiots as well.

07-20-2002, 01:06 PM	#8
Principia Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: anywhere Posts: 1,976	Dr. GH: The general consensus (much like what the morons are going by about the DH=Wolf=Julie thread) is that RFH in fact is Ronald Hirsch. But, Scott would have a better idea (e.g. <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=58&t=000864&p=" target="_blank">here</a>). Well, I must remember now that a prerequisite to being an IDist is to be versed in pseudo-linguistics to analyze your opponent...

07-20-2002, 02:47 PM	#9
MrDarwin Veteran Member Join Date: May 2001 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 4,140	I haven't been following things on ARN lately. I thought Mike Gene had quit the board?

07-20-2002, 02:58 PM	#10
Principia Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: anywhere Posts: 1,976	Nope, MG's back with a vengeance, mocking, psychoanalyzing, complaining, and evading, as usual. He's also adopted DNAUnion as his pet bloodhound. There's not much at ARN these days because, once again, the Moderator has slacked in his duties.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.