Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-03-2003, 03:31 PM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: northern suburbs of Toronto, Canada
Posts: 401
|
Voting Age
What exactly is immoral about people under 18 voting? Why must such people be prevented from participating in the democratic process? What adverse moral effects would underage voting have on the society?
Why is it moral to prevent those under 18 from voting? I personally am opposed to an age restriction on voting. What arguments are there in support of the voting age? |
06-03-2003, 03:49 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
|
Who states it's 'immoral'?
To vote one needs an understanding of politics in general (and perhaps economics). Teenagers may possess that. Would ten year olds? Or five year olds? |
06-03-2003, 03:53 PM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: northern suburbs of Toronto, Canada
Posts: 401
|
Many people vote today without an understanding of politics or economics. There would be a lot fewer voters if only those with such an understanding were allowed to vote.
What kinds of adverse effects are caused by voting children? Who does it harm if a person under 18 votes? |
06-03-2003, 03:55 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
|
It harms no one.
|
06-03-2003, 04:09 PM | #5 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: northern suburbs of Toronto, Canada
Posts: 401
|
Then why is it illegal?
|
06-03-2003, 08:39 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
|
It's illegal because adults say it is.
|
06-03-2003, 10:08 PM | #7 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: northern suburbs of Toronto, Canada
Posts: 401
|
Better question: Is it immoral for people to outlaw child voting? Is it moral for people to strike down such a law?
If a law has no purpose except to limit people from doing something moral, then is that law immoral? |
06-03-2003, 10:18 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
You can't give children the vote until you have a pretty good idea that they are forming their own opinion rather than simply voting the way they are told to by their parents. If you dont do that, then any groups of people that have disproportionately more children than other groups get to have their electoral clout doubled, tripled, quadrupled or more for at least an 18 - year period of their lives, during which they can tell their kids where to put the tick. You need to set the age somewhere that you can be fairly confident that the individual is making up their own mind.
Having said that, I suspect that 18 years is a bit high. |
06-03-2003, 11:19 PM | #9 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Location
Posts: 398
|
I started working at 16 and was working full-time by 17. Since payroll taxes were taken out of my paycheck, I remember that I used to consider it taxation without representation.
But I’m much older now and see nothing wrong with 18. |
06-04-2003, 12:47 PM | #10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: northern suburbs of Toronto, Canada
Posts: 401
|
I am 13 and I support a different political party than my parents. Besides, over 18s vote for the same party as their parents as well.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|