FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-19-2003, 08:05 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Default Dem Damn Beavers

From AiG's front page: Beavers prove the Existance of God

And who thought that Dembinski and Wilt were the only one to claim this?
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 01-19-2003, 08:34 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: secularcafe.org
Posts: 9,525
Default

Truly the beaver is yet another example of the wonderful provision and wise planning of a caring Creator God. Such variety of essential equipment could not have evolved over time by chance and selection. All of the beaver's equipment must be present and fully functional in the animal from the beginning for it to survive its semiaquatic life-style.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

But, I think that squirrels would be most appropriate.
Jobar is offline  
Old 01-19-2003, 08:52 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Default

Oh honestly.

The entire article comes down to this:

Quote:
All of the beaver's equipment must be present and fully functional in the animal from the beginning for it to survive its semiaquatic life-style.
Which is a simple non-seqiteur. What a waste of an article, to base it on a faulty premise. It reminds me of the raelians, who often write largely copied versions of basic introductory genetics papers, for the sole purpose of then saying "This knowledge of genetics means aliens, with their much greater knowledge, would have been able to create the human race" A whole article wasted on a fallacy. I might have wanted that oxygen.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 01-19-2003, 09:26 PM   #4
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington, the least religious state
Posts: 5,334
Default

Wow, these guys would be really blown away if they studied sea otters to any extent. Of course, the similarities of sea- to river-otters would have to be explained away somehow.

So does this mean that Beavers are a Kreated Kind (tm)?

HW
Happy Wonderer is offline  
Old 01-20-2003, 06:13 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Happy Wonderer
Wow, these guys would be really blown away if they studied sea otters to any extent.
Yeah, blown away at how well designed they are and how blind random chance couldn't possibly produce them or anything else.
tgamble is offline  
Old 01-20-2003, 09:17 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Default

And last week on the BBC board, someone was claiming that butterflies were the ultimate proof of God because metamorphosis couldn't have evolved.
Albion is offline  
Old 01-21-2003, 12:53 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
Default

id amuses me cuz its the jazzed up pseudoscience version of the old christian miracle of life argument. look at how beautiful and ordered the world is, how can you think that it is by accident.

what crap. descent with modification, big bang. get over it.
beyelzu is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 11:15 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 3,568
Default

Funny, I also used to say that the fact that beaver exists proves the existance of a kind, loving god!
DarkBronzePlant is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 02:49 PM   #9
KC
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Narcisco, RRR
Posts: 527
Default

Of course, if you cut off the tail of the beaver it simply changes function from a beaver to a big water rat. IC? Faugh!

Cheers,

KC
KC is offline  
Old 01-22-2003, 04:01 PM   #10
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Albion
And last week on the BBC board, someone was claiming that butterflies were the ultimate proof of God because metamorphosis couldn't have evolved.
Why was metamorphosis supposedly impossible?

To me, it's simple: different stages of growth get specialized in different directions.
lpetrich is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.