FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-10-2002, 07:29 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Post Articles at Talk.Design

I hadn't seen these articles at <a href="http://www.talkdesign.org" target="_blank">talk.design</a> yet, so I assume many of you haven't either. I liked the review of Phillip Johnson's Darwin on Trial, <a href="http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/johnson.html" target="_blank">The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth?,</a> and the article on <a href="http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/Evolving_Immunity.html" target="_blank">Evolving Immunity</a> is very interesting too.

[ August 10, 2002: Message edited by: ps418 ]</p>
ps418 is offline  
Old 08-10-2002, 11:17 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ps418:
<strong>I hadn't seen these articles at <a href="http://www.talkdesign.org" target="_blank">talk.design</a> yet, so I assume many of you haven't either. I liked the review of Phillip Johnson's Darwin on Trial, <a href="http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/johnson.html" target="_blank">The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth?,</a> and the article on <a href="http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/Evolving_Immunity.html" target="_blank">Evolving Immunity</a> is very interesting too.

[ August 10, 2002: Message edited by: ps418 ]</strong>
That one on Johnson is great! Has it been posted on arn?
tgamble is offline  
Old 08-10-2002, 11:27 AM   #3
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tgamble:
<strong>

That one on Johnson is great! Has it been posted on arn?</strong>
Oh, yeah, right...as if the moderators there would let it slip by.
pz is offline  
Old 08-10-2002, 11:34 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by ps418:
<strong>It is useless to try to explain science to someone who isn't interested in what the facts have to say. And it's useless to try to learn anything from such people. If they are clever, as Johnson is, they can find a way to claim that almost any fact supports their position. If evolutionists agree on something, it's a dogmatic orthodoxy; if they disagree, they're squabbling about every detail of evolutionary theory. If a piece of evidence seems to count against evolution, evolution has been disproven; if it seems to count for evolution, that merely shows that evolution is unfalsifiable. If scientists state that they are personally atheistic, they are clearly exposing the rotten metaphysical heart of evolution; if they state that they are religious, they are clearly trying to cover the rotten heart up. If we learn anything new, it's evidence that our current theory is completely false; if what we learn is exactly what we expected, it's only because we were precommitted to finding it in the first place. If we point out where creationists are wrong, we are persecuting the underdog; if we ignore them, we are refusing to face the fact that they're right. If a piece of evidence supports one part of evolutionary theory, it doesn't support that other part. If we find a strong piece of evidence for evolution, there ought to be more just like it. If an evolutionist speaks out in favor of Darwinism, it's because they were strong-armed into it; if they say anything which can be taken out of context to suggest any skepticism about evolution, it's resounding proof that nobody in science believes the theory.</strong>
Now that sums up the whole argument perfectly!
tgamble is offline  
Old 08-10-2002, 03:52 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
Post

*applause*
Camaban is offline  
Old 08-11-2002, 08:47 AM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orient, OH USA
Posts: 1,501
Post

<img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" /> <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />

Bubba
Bubba is offline  
Old 08-11-2002, 11:40 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Post

I particularly liked the conclusion at the end of that section:

""Intelligent design" creationists complain that our society's morals are being eroded because schoolchildren are being taught to think like scientists. God help our society's values if we teach our kids to think like Phillip Johnson."
Albion is offline  
Old 08-12-2002, 04:54 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: La Jolla, CA
Posts: 72
Post

speaking of talkdesign.org, they have a forum there. it doesn't get much business, but a lot of the threads are not meant to be discussions, but rather places to post information on a particular topic. for example, check out this thread, <a href="http://www.antievolution.org/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=3d5858b43e35ffff;act=ST;f=9;t=1" target="_blank">Invidious comparisons, The polemics of "intelligent design"</a>, where they collect quotes of IDists trying to equate evolution with something negative, like nazis.
rafe gutman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:42 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.