Freethought & Rationalism Archive

meritocrat · 09-25-2003, 10:43 PM

I want ALL ten-18 year olds to fight me.

PROVE your viewpoints!!!!!!!!!

mikester · 09-25-2003, 11:26 PM

what the hell?

fight you how?

Defiant Heretic · 09-25-2003, 11:37 PM

Resolved: that solipsism is a non-falsifiable hypothesis.
I will be arguing the positive.

As for the method of debate, I chose pistols at dawn.

mikester · 09-25-2003, 11:45 PM

ill take a stab at it:

solipsism (being completely new to me) can be deemed false when one asserts that a person cannot truly know one's self since simply existing cannot be proven either.

did that make sense? im trying really hard...damn.

edit: as for the style of fighting, i choose street fighting, no rules, weapons allowed, and no shots to the balls.

me: head-butt, punch to the gut, kick to the face, and another kick to the ribs.

fight over.

meritocrat · 09-28-2003, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mikester
what the hell?

fight you how?

The way of the fist.

Evil Milkman · 09-28-2003, 05:09 PM

The use of a firearm on knee caps usually takes care of things, doensn't it?

ju'iblex · 09-28-2003, 05:23 PM

you want to fight ten year olds? Good grief, off to elsewhere. And there i was hoping you meant "fight" in the verbal debating kind of way.

Chicken Girl · 09-28-2003, 07:34 PM

it's a good thing I'm not a teen anymore.

Something tells me meritocrat isn't above fighting girls.

Gurdur · 09-28-2003, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Chicken Girl
.....
Something tells me meritocrat isn't above fighting girls.

According to some, that's even more fun, especially when you lose.

Weltall · 09-28-2003, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mikester as for the style of fighting, i choose street fighting, no rules, weapons allowed, and no shots to the balls.

Now that this is in elsewhere I can comment. No rules/street fighting means that hitting below the belt is ok. Unless you mean "No rules as to what I can't do, you on the other hand...". Sissy.

09-25-2003, 10:43 PM	#1
meritocrat Banned Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: England Posts: 2,608	Challenges I want ALL ten-18 year olds to fight me. PROVE your viewpoints!!!!!!!!!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

09-25-2003, 11:26 PM	#2
mikester Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland Posts: 813	what the hell? fight you how?

09-25-2003, 11:37 PM	#3
Defiant Heretic Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,288	Resolved: that solipsism is a non-falsifiable hypothesis. I will be arguing the positive. As for the method of debate, I chose pistols at dawn.

09-25-2003, 11:45 PM	#4
mikester Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland Posts: 813	ill take a stab at it: solipsism (being completely new to me) can be deemed false when one asserts that a person cannot truly know one's self since simply existing cannot be proven either. did that make sense? im trying really hard...damn. edit: as for the style of fighting, i choose street fighting, no rules, weapons allowed, and no shots to the balls. me: head-butt, punch to the gut, kick to the face, and another kick to the ribs. fight over.

09-28-2003, 05:09 PM	#6
Evil Milkman Regular Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Illinois Posts: 499	The use of a firearm on knee caps usually takes care of things, doensn't it?

09-28-2003, 05:23 PM	#7
ju'iblex Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Sydney Australia and beyond the realms of Gehenna Posts: 6,035	you want to fight ten year olds? Good grief, off to elsewhere. And there i was hoping you meant "fight" in the verbal debating kind of way.

09-28-2003, 07:34 PM	#8
Chicken Girl Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: nowhere Posts: 6,549	it's a good thing I'm not a teen anymore. Something tells me meritocrat isn't above fighting girls.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.