FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-24-2002, 03:49 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Post A Question for Christian Apologists

If you don't thnk you are mistaken, why are you apologising?

bor Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 04-24-2002, 04:53 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 60
Post

Boro,

Not to stick up for apologists, but in the religious context the term means "to defend," not "to apologize" in the usual sense. But you're joking, right?
Net Rover is offline  
Old 04-24-2002, 05:26 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 420
Post

Let's hope...

Actually, apologetics, while I certainly don't agree with many of their arguments, are to be expected. When you think about it, the burden of proof lies with the theists, not us. We're not trying to assert anything, unless your an extreme militant atheist. So I suppose we should see a few thousand more clones of "Evidence that Demands a Verdict".
case is offline  
Old 04-24-2002, 08:20 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Net Rover:
<strong>Boro,

Not to stick up for apologists, but in the religious context the term means "to defend," not "to apologize" in the usual sense. But you're joking, right?</strong>
No I'm not, but please accept my defend for my error.

Boro Nut
Boro Nut is offline  
Old 04-24-2002, 10:14 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 60
Post

Good one, Boro.

But if my understanding of "apology" requires more "defense," look it up in <a href="http://www.m-w.com/" target="_blank">Merriam-Webster's online dictionary</a>. There "apology" is given a primary definition of a "formal justification: Defense."

Edited to correct spacing errror. My apologies...

Edited again(!) to correct a non-working URL. I'm getting defensive here...

[ April 24, 2002: Message edited by: Net Rover ]

[ April 24, 2002: Message edited by: Net Rover ]</p>
Net Rover is offline  
Old 03-30-2003, 09:20 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 710
Default

Yes, that was funny.

It took me a while to understand the true meaning of the term. Now that I know, I try my best to stand up for the veracity behind my faith.

Kevin
spurly is offline  
Old 03-30-2003, 09:22 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada. Finally.
Posts: 10,155
Default

spurly :

With all due respect, don't you think it might be better to addresss questions raised on some of the threads you've already bumped, instead of simply bumping more threads?
Queen of Swords is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:32 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.