Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-05-2002, 05:41 PM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
|
Richard Dawkins and his critics
People like Phillip johson have constantly attacked Dawkins for various reasons. Others have attacked his solution to the alleged information problem etc.
I was wondering if Dawkins had a response online? Is he even aware of it? Or is he just dismissing people like johnson as ignorant twits who don't deserve a response? |
05-05-2002, 05:46 PM | #2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orient, OH USA
Posts: 1,501
|
Actually, I find anti-Dawkins sentiment to be the best evidence FOR macroevolution. Ever notice how nobody ever even starts to interact with ANY of Dawkins arguements???
If evolution is so weak, why not just write a response and be done with it?? But in the nearly 150 year history, there have been no real logical criticisms whatsoever. Actually, I wish simeone would try to answer some of Dawkins arguements. It would move the debate to a higher and more intellectually honest ground. Bubba |
05-05-2002, 07:19 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Lincoln, England
Posts: 1,499
|
Try <a href="http://www.world-of-dawkins.com/" target="_blank">World of Dawkins</a>. They seem to have most of his online writings there.
|
05-06-2002, 10:06 AM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
|
|
05-07-2002, 07:41 AM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,238
|
I read an article once that described how he was blindsided by a couple of creationist quote-miners posing as reporters. His realization of what they were up to happened to coincide with a question about one of his specialties, and his silence while he considered his options was mistaken for ignorance.
Can't seem to locate the reference, though... But as I understand it, that's why he won't respond or deal directly with creationists and/or IDists. |
05-07-2002, 08:03 AM | #6 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Quote:
Dawkins rarely engages directly with cretinists because to do so gives them the kudos of appearing to be arguing on an equal footing; that there is a scientific argument to be had. They should not be given this kudos. He has however occasionally ripped into creationist books. See for ex this review of Milton’s Facts of Life: <a href="http://www.world-of-dawkins.com/Dawkins/Work/Articles/shattering_the_myths.htm" target="_blank">http://www.world-of-dawkins.com/Dawkins/Work/Articles/shattering_the_myths.htm</a> |
|
05-07-2002, 09:14 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
Posts: 460
|
Richard Dawkins...
|
05-07-2002, 09:26 AM | #8 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
|
Quote:
<a href="http://www.kcfs.org/thelink/LinkV1N3screen.pdf" target="_blank">Kansas Citizens for Science Newsletter December 2001</a> Dawkins' comical love letter to Dembski is on page two. Hold on to your eyes Douglas J. Bender, lest they roll right out of your head, across the floor, and down the stairs. |
|
05-07-2002, 10:23 AM | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
|
Quote:
|
|
05-07-2002, 10:42 AM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Douglas J. Bender
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|