Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
10-29-2002, 02:18 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 173
|
Cancer and specified complexity
Does anyone on this forum know if it is possible to apply the ID "theory" of specified complexity to a real-world example?
For instance couldn't a spontaneous mutation leading to cancer be classified as an example of specified complexity? If not, why? |
10-29-2002, 05:39 AM | #2 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
|
Quote:
In fact, specified complexity should be dispensed with entirely because it's a superfluous middle-man. It works like this: extremely improbably --> specifed complexity --> design. Instead, it would make more sense to say: extreme improbability --> design. Rather than specifed complexity being a reliable indicator of design as Dembski claims, it's really just a label applied to something after you've already decided that it was designed. Quote:
theyeti |
||
10-29-2002, 11:57 AM | #3 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 173
|
Thanks for the answer theyeti!
|
10-29-2002, 12:25 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
|
Quote:
1/100! = 1.07 X 10^-158 = 1 in 9.3 X 10^157 probability of any particular ordering of senators occuring. |
|
10-29-2002, 01:20 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
|
Quote:
My answer: The whole "specificity" issue is the real problem. Who says anything is specified in advance? Is a bacterial flagellum specifed, or will any propulsion system do? For that matter, why should "propulsion" be specified? Lots of bacteria don't even have that. theyeti |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|