FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2002, 02:42 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,196
Talking Question on the Bible

How do we know that the Bible wasn't intended to be a kind of novel?

Have you ever read Tolkein's The Similarion? To me, it reads just like the Bible, without the designated books and verses and such. The similarity in style and prose is interesting.

Of course, Tolkein's book is irrelevant. But it did get me to ponder this question. After all, the Bible plays out like a good, epic novel--God creating the world in the beginning, a number of interesting stories and events, the climax being Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection, and the somewhat epilogue ending with Revelation, as if there would be a sequel in the Christian Bible fantasy series.
Secular Elation is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 03:55 PM   #2
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Secular Elation:
<strong>How do we know that the Bible wasn't intended to be a kind of novel?

...</strong>
We don't. I think it was.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 03:56 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: California
Posts: 6,196
Post

Well, yeah, technically we don't know. I was merely using common phrasing.

EDIT: F--ing typos.

[ April 26, 2002: Message edited by: Secular Elation ]</p>
Secular Elation is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 04:03 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post

You have to also consider the fact that the Bible may have been used as the model for later novels, thus the similarity.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 09:20 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 153
Post

I would say that Lord of The Rings and Dune were bible influenced novels just to name a couple. The whole thing with Paul and his GodHead in Dune really slayed me. Do you think Herbert did this on purpose? Ever read The Jesus Incident, by Herbert?

However, the Bible is not the first or earliest - it borrowed much of its mythologies from the Sumerian and Babylonian. This is really evidenced in Genesis, where both mythology sources are presented, despite the conflicts (man created last day after other animals, man created before other animals, Serpent in the tree, the seemingly two different God's in the garden, flood stuff, 7 pairs on the ark, 1 pair on the ark, etc.) But it goes on throughout the book.

Well, as the hero of that story says, "I come as a thief."

Thief = Plagarist
SmashingIdols is offline  
Old 04-27-2002, 08:03 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 26
Post

Quote:
How do we know that the Bible wasn't intended to be a kind of novel?
There were many scriptures and epistles about Jesus that never made it into the Bible. For example, Gnostic texts. In the 4th Century Roman Emperor Constantine (i think) and his council decided they need to consolidate all these Jesus scriptures that were authored by many different people and so they decided what they think should go in the Bible and what shouldn't. This doesn't sound like the making of a novel to me.

Furthermore, before the 4th century, Christians didn't follow a Bible. They followed various different scriptures (some made it into the Bible, most didn't) that often contradicted each other on the most basic principles. Before the 4th Century, a NT Bible didn't exist but its various sections did already. Doesn't sound like it was ever meant to be a novel. Would be funny though.
krazytamak is offline  
Old 04-28-2002, 07:26 AM   #7
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by SmashingIdols:
<strong>
Well, as the hero of that story says, "I come as a thief."

Thief = Plagarist</strong>
The hero is a "thief" because our persona is the imposter. The battle is between the true identity and the persona in which the true identity (called Christ) must be the victor and the persona must be nailed to the cross. The liberation of Bar-abbas is the liberation of the "thief." Bar-abbas is "son of the father."
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.