FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-23-2002, 05:45 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Cool Dating last common ancestors of primates via fossils

From the current Nature, 416, 726 - 729 (2002) comes this fascinating article:

Quote:
Using the fossil record to estimate the age of the last common ancestor of extant primates

Simon Tavaré, Charles R. Marshall, Oliver Will, Christophe Soligo and Robert D. Martin

Divergence times estimated from molecular data often considerably predate the earliest known fossil representatives of the groups studied. For the order Primates, molecular data calibrated with various external fossil dates uniformly suggest a mid-Cretaceous divergence from other placental mammals, some 90 million years (Myr) ago, whereas the oldest known fossil primates are from the basal Eocene epoch (54–55 Myr ago). The common ancestor of primates should be earlier than the oldest known fossils, but adequate quantification is needed to interpret possible discrepancies between molecular and palaeontological estimates. Here we present a new statistical method, based on an estimate of species preservation derived from a model of the diversification pattern, that suggests a Cretaceous last common ancestor of primates, approximately 81.5 Myr ago, close to the initial divergence time inferred from molecular data. It also suggests that no more than 7% of all primate species that have ever existed are known from fossils. The approach unites all the available palaeontological methods of timing evolutionary events: the fossil record, extant species and clade diversification models.
Nice to see the fossil folks coming into line with the molecules...

Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 08:12 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,302
Post

Aye...
pangloss is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 08:23 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
Post

Quote:
Nice to see the fossil folks coming into line with the molecules...
But the creationists will just claim its all part of the big evolutionist conspiracy. "You must agree with the party line or face penalties" or some such.
MortalWombat is offline  
Old 04-23-2002, 02:52 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orient, OH USA
Posts: 1,501
Wink

Thanks, Oolon. I lurk here to get good science information that I might not otherwise read.

Bubba
Bubba is offline  
Old 04-25-2002, 12:56 AM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Arrow

Bumped for Thanatos's attention.
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.