Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-04-2002, 09:07 AM | #11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
How about this one:
|
06-04-2002, 09:14 AM | #12 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 234
|
Quote:
|
|
06-04-2002, 09:48 AM | #13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 7,735
|
Some of these holy fools have far too much time on their hands.
|
06-04-2002, 10:10 AM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 2,362
|
Quote:
m. |
|
06-04-2002, 10:44 AM | #15 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
|
Lower Michigan is the hand of God! (wearing a mitten)
|
06-04-2002, 11:46 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
|
Quote:
|
|
06-05-2002, 02:02 AM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 965
|
Interesting. The first time I looked at the magnified picture, I saw a deformed face (alien? devil?) in the Mexico area, with a nude woman's torso above it.
Yes, it looks like a face if one knows where to look. (The image resembling an eye is also there, though with less details than advertised.) There are two possibile explanations: 1) God has put an image of Jesus in the ocean. 2) The image is just a coincidence, just like the famous face on Mars. You know which explanation I prefer. (If you don't, I'll give you a hint: it is not the first one.) Mike Rosoft [ June 05, 2002: Message edited by: Mike Rosoft ]</p> |
06-05-2002, 05:43 AM | #18 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Reading,PA
Posts: 233
|
At least to me the picture on the left looked more like a siloute *sp* of Alfered Hitchcock.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|