FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2002, 12:47 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Post Douglas / Scigirl Peanut Gallery 3

Just to let everyone know, Douglas has now posted some new stuff in his <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=8&t=000008" target="_blank">formal debate with scigirl</a>. Discuss.

Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 03-26-2002, 12:57 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI, USA
Posts: 77
Post

Does Douglas have some kind of a point? If so, I can't tell what it is. All I see is a bunch of one- and two-sentence non sequiturs, assertions, and witticisms.

If this is what passes for a formal debate, you might as well go ahead and close the thread.
LiveFreeOrDie is offline  
Old 03-26-2002, 01:31 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Post

Well, with this comment:

Quote:
It is a geographical boundary "pre-appointed" by God. Nations, cities, etcetera. Certain people whose "pre-appointed boundary" was "exposed to malaria on a continuing basis" would be likely candidates for God's mercy giving them a means to resist that disease. Should they leave that "pre-appointed boundary", their "advantage" might prove a disadvantage, creating a "momentum" or "inertia" (?) for them to remain within their "pre-appointed boundary".
it sure sounds like God is punishing African Americans for the exceedingly bad fortune of their ancestors being forcibly removed from their "pre-appointed boundary" and enslaved!
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 03-26-2002, 01:43 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,777
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by LiveFreeOrDie:
<strong>If this is what passes for a formal debate, you might as well go ahead and close the thread.</strong>
I just read the latest post, and I completely agree.
Jayhawker Soule is offline  
Old 03-26-2002, 02:26 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Post

Queeg strikes yet again.

SC
Principia is offline  
Old 03-27-2002, 01:52 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Jorja, USA
Posts: 920
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by LiveFreeOrDie:
<strong>Does Douglas have some kind of a point? If so, I can't tell what it is. All I see is a bunch of one- and two-sentence non sequiturs, assertions, and witticisms.

If this is what passes for a formal debate, you might as well go ahead and close the thread.</strong>
Wow, yeah . The first thing I read this morning was the latest post by Douglas, and I was thinking "Wonder if we've got a thread where I can comment on the complete lack of content here?". Lo and behold, the second post to that thread summarises my thoughts perfectly!
Tigermilk is offline  
Old 03-27-2002, 05:51 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Post

Sorry guys,

I guess I am partially responsible for getting Douglas to his present, non-responsive state. I love how despite admitting he's not an expert either in mathematics or biology, he actually believes that he can make significant (or more significant) statements than the true experts.

SC
Principia is offline  
Old 03-27-2002, 06:18 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
Talking

Blimey, just read it properly meself! What a waste of bandwidth!

There seems to be only one substantial point:

Quote:
Originally posted by Douglas:

It is a geographical boundary "pre-appointed" by God. Nations, cities, etcetera. Certain people whose "pre-appointed boundary" was "exposed to malaria on a continuing basis" would be likely candidates for God's mercy giving them a means to resist that disease. Should they leave that "pre-appointed boundary", their "advantage" might prove a disadvantage, creating a "momentum" or "inertia" (?) for them to remain within their "pre-appointed boundary".
So stuff that moves outside this (undefined) boundary might be at a disadvantage?! You don’t say! But then again, it might not. The opening of the Suez Canal has led to a massive influx of Red Sea species into the Mediterranean (at a rate of ten new forms per year – and hardly any the other way). Many Mediterranean species are now in decline, and the native prawn is almost gone (Steve Jones 1999). Similarly, grey squirrels have driven the native red squirrels to near extinction in Britain in the 150 years since their introduction from America, and in their fifty years here American mink (Mustela vison) have caused a 30-50% fall in ground-nesting birds in Scotland and a “catastrophic” decline in water voles throughout Britain. According to a government inquiry, “Unlike in the mink's own native America, our native birds and mammals have no natural defence mechanisms to deal with this predator.” There are countless other examples of organisms introduced by man to a region where they did not exist before out-competing the local fauna and flora, such as rabbits in Australia, and the devastation on local Galápagos fauna wreaked by man’s introduction of pigs, goats, rats, dogs, fire ants, etc.

Thus, some creatures designed by God to fit their circumstances, when they get outside these ‘boundaries’, can prosper... and others, equally designed for their environment, can be pushed out, even unto extinction, by the new arrivals. So being outside your "pre-appointed boundary" might be a disadvantage... or an advantage. In other words, what sodding boundaries?

Oolon
Oolon Colluphid is offline  
Old 03-27-2002, 06:30 AM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: land of confusion
Posts: 178
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Scientiae:
<strong>
I love how despite admitting he's not an expert either in mathematics or biology, he actually believes that he can make significant (or more significant) statements than the true experts.

SC</strong>
Does this remind anyone of rantman as well?
pseudobug is offline  
Old 03-27-2002, 06:34 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Posts: 666
Post

Exactly what I was thinking, pseudobug. Why, between randman's grasp of paleontology and Douglas's expertise in math and "discerning valid from invalid science," they could rule the world!
Darwin's Finch is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.