Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-19-2002, 09:19 AM | #51 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,102
|
Quote:
|
|
09-19-2002, 11:15 AM | #52 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
Primal:
Quote:
|
|
09-19-2002, 11:20 AM | #53 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
It has always confused me that a woman's nipple is considered obscene or indecent while a man's nipple is ignored.
Glory |
09-19-2002, 11:23 AM | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
|
Does doing away with nudity bans mean doing away with bans on public lewdness? It does not follow.
Glory [ September 19, 2002: Message edited by: Glory ]</p> |
09-19-2002, 11:52 AM | #55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Georgia USA
Posts: 927
|
I know from experience that nursing discreetly isn't always accepted. I can remember trying to nurse a 2 week old under a blanket in a Walmart bathroom and getting nasty comments and mother hiding their little girls' eyes. I was under a blanket hiding in a nasty bathroom for goodness' sake and it still wasn't good enough!
I finally decided that making a baby eat in a bathroom is nasty. I have always used a blanket or sling to cover up with when I have nursed in public. I've come to the conclusion that I would much rather deal with disapproving glares from strangers than listen to a screaming hungry baby. I still don't understand what the big deal is with women's boobs. I've seen fat guys at the beach with bigger boobs than a lot of women. Why is it acceptable for them to wear no shirt, but I get dirty looks for nursing a baby under a blanket. |
09-19-2002, 12:00 PM | #56 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
Frankly, I don't understand what the big deal with women's breasts is either. Oh, they contribute to an overall pleasing shape, but so do many other body parts, and personally I'd rather be staring at someone's ass or legs.
|
09-19-2002, 12:12 PM | #57 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,842
|
Quote:
(And, yes, I think he looks splendid in a toga!) |
|
09-19-2002, 02:17 PM | #58 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,047
|
Quote:
|
|
09-19-2002, 02:35 PM | #59 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Marcos
Posts: 551
|
Quote:
1) The whelp doesn't need to eat then and there. 2) Bottles are around. Also, why is the babies need for food seen as compelling but not a person's need for sexual satisfaction? Also, adults then should be able to have a little drink once in a while too. Like I said I don't want to see a woman feedong her pup, the pup won't die if its not fed out there and then. So no, I don't see why the "need to feed immediately in public" takes precedence over my need to not see it. Trons: Quote:
|
||
09-19-2002, 03:13 PM | #60 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
|
Tron:
So, you're a leg man. I'm a breast man. I won't knock your fetish, but don't knock mine. OK? Keith. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|