Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-10-2002, 12:38 AM | #11 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 214
|
bump?
|
09-10-2002, 01:10 AM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
Sorry monkenstick, I think my heartless insensitive comments in the first few posts in this thread have blown your chances of getting a reply.
|
09-10-2002, 06:46 AM | #13 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Snyder,Texas,USA
Posts: 4,411
|
monkenstick: I have placed your sequences, with painfully (for me, I'm an amateur at this) crafted explanations, on three different boards along with requests for non-evolutionary explanations for them. I have, so far, one response from a creationist, and it was a one-line attempt at humor. I'm totally unsurprised, but just a tad puzzled - why do the silly bastards even try to "debate" at all? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
|
09-12-2002, 04:52 AM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
|
I'll bump this, but I also doubt Vander will address it. Way over his head.
[ September 12, 2002: Message edited by: Zetek ]</p> |
09-12-2002, 05:44 AM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,504
|
That is an excellent post, and should probably be archived.
Peez |
09-16-2002, 05:01 PM | #16 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 214
|
hear that?
its the deafening silence of an unanswered challenge |
09-16-2002, 05:59 PM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,162
|
<cricket chirping...>
|
09-16-2002, 07:15 PM | #18 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 499
|
Maybe he's on another holiday?
|
09-16-2002, 08:31 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 694
|
Monken,
OK, I'll bite. The first order of business is to make this more than a hypothetical discussion: With the confidence you exhibit, I presume that you have several independent corroborating studies which support your presentation. Please provide definitive references. Vanderzyden |
09-16-2002, 08:37 PM | #20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
While you are at it, you'd better make sure you can corroborate THEM, as well.
Vander, If you think this 'corroboration' thing you've hit on is a big deal, think again. These studies we are citing are not strange obscure little one-off papers, they demonstrate the generally held consencus of thousands of biologists. Undisputed: that human chromosome 23 is the product of a fusion event. Undisputed: that humans share 98% of their genes with Chimps. We can certainly find corroborating studies for these, but where will it end? At 2 verified papers? 3 papers? just where have you set your standard for corroboration? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|