Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-02-2003, 08:39 PM | #1 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
|
Tony Blair following in Bush's footsteps eroding C/S Separation in Britain
And on the seventh day Tony Blair created...
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
08-02-2003, 09:58 PM | #2 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
"... quietly the Prime Minister is putting religion at the centre of the New Labour project, reflecting his own deeply felt beliefs that answers to most questions can be found in the Bible."
Hmmm... let us consider the Bible's answer to the question "What is the shape of the Earth?" So Blair is not only Britain's answer to Clinton, but also Britain's answer to the Seedling himself, GWB? Or is he simply trying to get the "religious vote"? Complete with offeriing "religious pork", as it may be called (that's what that "faith-based" stuff seems to me to be). |
08-02-2003, 10:26 PM | #3 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 6,997
|
Quote:
|
|
08-02-2003, 10:34 PM | #4 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mayfield, NZ
Posts: 1,407
|
Do remember please that there is no such thing as Church / State separation in the uK. The Church of England is an Established church that is,
Quote:
Kiwimac |
|
08-02-2003, 10:41 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 762
|
Aye, should have titled it "secularism" instead of "C/S separation" but, well, there is becoming less of it now regardless I guess.
|
08-03-2003, 04:17 PM | #6 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 478
|
yeah, kiwimac beat me to it...
"god save the queen" anybody? Still... Canada is looking bloody good as a place to live in these days... |
08-04-2003, 12:51 AM | #7 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 279
|
I still don't think this country is religious at all. If Blair hadn't kept quiet about his faith, he wouldn't have become leader of the Labour party in the first place, let alone Prime Minister.
|
08-04-2003, 07:16 AM | #8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We now have the encouraging spectacle of the leaders of both the Labour and Conservative parties trying to play the faith card for all they're worth. I would have thought it was a miscalculation, but the majority of voters seem to care about hospitals, schools, law and order, asylum seekers and taxes, and that's about it.
Major constitutional changes, increased sectarianism as a result of more faith-based schools, and discrimination against non-believers and gays all seem to slip in under the radar. |
08-04-2003, 08:58 AM | #9 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 197
|
More religion means less free thinking and more support by default.
Well, he has to try ALL means to get support. More religion means less free thinking and more support by default. King or prime-minister is a representative of god, right? So, if you believe in god you MUST believe to your king or prime-minister.
Its very simple logic. Good luck, Tony Blair, in trying to brainwash your people. Religion is getting obsolete day by day, so your support. |
08-04-2003, 01:37 PM | #10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 478
|
No tony, while the queen is 'ordained by god' the PM is democratically elected, and no god is blamed for election results... well hopefully anyway....
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|