FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2003, 03:20 PM   #1
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: on the border between here and there, WV
Posts: 373
Talking i want some outrageous creationist sites!

i want some outrageous creationist sties, and i'm too damn lazy to use google and hunt and peck through hundreds of sites just to find one gem among the trash heap that is creationism.

so list the most outrageous, awful, and painful-to-look-at creationist sites you can think of.

happyboy, in desperate need of a good laugh
happyboy is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 03:30 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,214
Default

http://www.drdino.com/
Abacus is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 04:27 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Albucrazy, New Mexico
Posts: 1,425
Default

www.icr.org
WWSD is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 05:24 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by WWSD
www.icr.org
Pathlights Encyclopedia.
http://www.pathlights.com

Worst site ever.

Jack Chick. Not a creationist site really (like the ICR anyway) but he's a crackpot and he's a YEC.
http://www.chick.com

Also look up Fred Williams page. "Evolution, a fairy tale for grownups" and the site "Evolution nonsense page"
tgamble is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 05:57 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,613
Default

Yeah, the Dr. Dino site is really special. I sent him an email years ago telling him that human foot-print fossil intermingled with the dino prints was really grand, especially in light of the fact that it's been debunked so many times. (He actually responded by referring me to the guy that runs the creationist museum.)

Hovind should be jailed for hindering society.
snoiduspoitus is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 06:17 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: on the border between here and there, WV
Posts: 373
Talking

oh, yeah, this is what i was wanting: http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=faq&specific=8

rofl go, creationists!:notworthy

a very awestruck happyboy
happyboy is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 06:24 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: on the border between here and there, WV
Posts: 373
Default

another priceless gem: http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=articles&specific=20

thank you, dr hovind, thank you for shedding light on genetic mysteries that have confounded scientists for years. it's all so simple, really.......:notworthy

happyboy
happyboy is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 04:35 AM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,261
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by tgamble
[B]Pathlights Encyclopedia.
http://www.pathlights.com

Worst site ever.
Jesus F. Christ, that's one stupid site. And I only read one page. It's about why "evolutionist" theories about the formation of solar system are false... not only one, but seven straw men one stupider than the other are presented, along with idiotic reasons why they don't work. Quotes:
Quote:
#1 - NEBULAR HYPOTHESIS

The theory: Hydrogen and other gases swirled around and condensed into our sun and its planets.
Let's just skip the formation of other elements shall we? It seems to be very common among YECs that they don't have a slightest clue about the formation of solar system, or what the EVILutionists say about it. They just figure that there was a big bang, and *poof* earth and all planets appear from nowhere. Well duh.
Quote:
Why the theory is not true:

1 - Gas in outer space (as here on earth) expands; it does not contract.

2 - There would be nothing to swirl it around; and, even if it could, there would be nothing to push gas into suns and rock.
...
5 - Interstellar gas is not today condensing. It is always expanding.
I would not assume creationists to follow the latest scientific findings, but maybe it's about time somebody told them about this new, controversial theory called gravity?
Quote:
6 - Our sun is rotating too slowly for the theory to be true.
As if they did the math. But if you believe pi is equal to three, I guess you could model pretty much anything in biblical terms.
Quote:
#2 - FISSION THEORY

The theory: One day our sun burst open, and planets and moons shot out at high speeds and went to their respective places, then stopped, and started orbiting the
sun, as the moons began orbiting the planets. (Charles Darwin's son, *George Darwin, said the moon lifted out of the Pacific Ocean on a high tide and began orbiting
the earth.)
Cripes, how old is this theory anyway? 150 years?
Quote:
#3 - CAPTURE THEORY

The theory: Planets and moons were flying around, and some were captured by our sun and began circling.

Why the theory is not true:

1 - Outer space is too large for nine planets and sixty moons to be caught by our sun. Millions would have to pass, in order for one to be caught.

2 - No planets or moons are flying by us today
:banghead:
Quote:
#4 - ACCRETION THEORY
Wow, they at least got the name of one of real theories correct. Maybe there is hope for creationists yet?
Quote:
The theory: A pile of space dust and rock chunks pushed together into our planet, and another pile pushed itself into our moon. Then the moon got close enough
and began encircling the earth.

Why the theory is not true:

1 - Where did the space dust and rock come from?
Okay, I take that back, there is no hope.
Quote:
# 5 - PLANETARY COLLISION THEORY

The theory: Our world collided with a small planet, and the explosion threw off rocks which became the moon, and then it began orbiting us.

Why the theory is not true:

1 - Such an impact would destroy the earth.
Yeah, all the rocks that make up earth would have magically annihilated and vanished when something hits the earth. Just like in "break-out".
Quote:
2 - Material from the explosion would keep moving outward forever.—p. 11.

3 - Outward moving material would not stop and begin circling.
:banghead:

After that, the morons start repeating themselves. I guess it is kind of funny to read this stuff, but it's also sad that people can be actually this stupid.
Jayjay is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 04:57 AM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: on the border between here and there, WV
Posts: 373
Talking

oh, yeah! this was EXACTLY what i wanted!

may the one true Godzilla smash tokyo to bits in blessing of these brave, brave creationists. :notworthy

happyboy,who is now very amused
happyboy is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 07:08 AM   #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
Default Off to E/C

See ya.
GunnerJ is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.