FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-02-2002, 04:06 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Wink

Quote:
Originally posted by Jimmy Higgins:
<strong>Hmmm. I've had a 2 trillion dollar (US), offer on the proof of theism for a while now. I haven't awarded the prize yet. Must mean theism isn't true.</strong>
Okay. I hereby say "God exists, God exists, God exists" therefore God exists therefore theism is true and therefore you owe two trillion United States dollars.

What? You don't accept this line of argument? I think you just don't to may me the money.

See you in court. Unless you want to settle for writing me a check for a few thousand. This just shows my generous nature since that settlement costs less than the your attorney's fees would be if we went ot court.

;-) ;-)
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 10-02-2002, 04:09 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Coragyps:
<strong>The biggest question remaining is: if Hovind uses that $250,000 to pay his defense lawyer, will the lawyer have to report it to Internal Revenue? </strong>
I don't think this is a problem. After all John Gotti had a lawyer and a rather good one at that.

;-)

[ October 02, 2002: Message edited by: Valentine Pontifex ]</p>
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 10-02-2002, 10:02 AM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia
Posts: 42,473
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Valentine Pontifex:
<strong>Okay. I hereby say "God exists, God exists, God exists" therefore God exists therefore theism is true and therefore you owe two trillion United States dollars.

What? You don't accept this line of argument? I think you just don't to may me the money.
;-) ;-)</strong>
Well, it isn't me. I need to gather a board of atheists together to discuss whether they agree with your logic. Its their decision, not mine, though I am on the board. And the decision must be unanimous! And I have an overriding vote, if needed.

Also, I need to ask you how your feeling on theism disproves evolution (albeit star evolution, macro-micro-nano evolution, and why the sky is blue).
Jimmy Higgins is offline  
Old 10-02-2002, 05:10 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orient, OH USA
Posts: 1,501
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Camaban:
<strong>tgamble: That prediction is just freaky in its future accuracy...



(But a bit more intelligent than previous responses he's made)

[ October 01, 2002: Message edited by: Camaban ]</strong>
Ditto

Bubba is offline  
Old 10-02-2002, 06:05 PM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 473
Post

*remembers one quote when someone was using the polar bear as evidence for macroevolution*

Quote:
Can't you see the forest for the trees? IT'S STILL A BEAR!
On another note, I reckon he'd have so much more credibility if he actually made an attempt at being polite past the first few correspondences.
Camaban is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 08:49 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sun Valley, CA
Posts: 22
Post

Update: $250,000 Evolution Challenge Accepted!

As of October 8, 2002 Dr. Hovind has not responded -- let alone awarded the $250,000 prize to Callahan:

A long-standing offer to prove evolution has recently been accepted by John D. Callahan, a theistic evolutionist and president of Faith & Reason Ministries: Reconciling Christianity with Accepted Science, <a href="http://www.faithreason.org/" target="_blank">http://www.faithreason.org/</a> . The offer is being made by Dr. Kent Hovind, a young-Earth creationist and leader of Creation Science Evangelism, <a href="http://www.drdino.com/" target="_blank">http://www.drdino.com/</a> .

Dr. Hovind's challenge has been a rallying cry for creationists, and he asserts few, if any, legitimate inquires have been made -- and certainly no proof. However, evolutionists contend Dr. Hovind is not open to empirical evidence and scientific method. In an open letter to Dr. Hovind, Callahan claims to concisely prove evolution consistent with belief in God. The letter may be viewed at <a href="http://www.faithreason.org/" target="_blank">http://www.faithreason.org/</a> .
John is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 08:57 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

Is Hovind even a free man at this time?
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 09:01 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by John:
<strong>Update: $250,000 Evolution Challenge Accepted!

As of October 8, 2002 Dr. Hovind has not responded -- let alone awarded the $250,000 prize to Callahan:
</strong>
Of course it has not been awarded. Mr. Hovind's conditions have not been met. They will never be met because the wording of the challenge is worded in such a way to be impossible to meet even if evolution is true and there is excellent evidence for it (which of course there is).
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 09:45 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: US east coast. And www.theroyalforums.com
Posts: 2,829
Post

Well, that example of wolves turning into pugs is just going to be sneered at as proving that an intelligent designer is needed before anything can turn into anything. Except that things can't turn into other things. Well-known fact (to YECs, anyway). So an intelligent designer is required to make sure that things don't turn into other things. Um...
Albion is offline  
Old 10-09-2002, 02:29 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ecuador
Posts: 738
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Albion:
<strong>Well, that example of wolves turning into pugs is just going to be sneered at as proving that an intelligent designer is needed before anything can turn into anything. Except that things can't turn into other things. Well-known fact (to YECs, anyway). So an intelligent designer is required to make sure that things don't turn into other things. Um...</strong>
Nope. Remember, kinds only ever produce after their kind. Ya know - Diploblast and Triploblast kinds, bacteria kind, archaea kind, etc. It's all microevolution from there...
Quetzal is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:56 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.