FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-09-2003, 04:05 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default Oh dear, oh dearie me

Quote:
US troops shoot 2 dead for selling guns
(title of news item altered by Gurdur)

........
US snipers shot dead two Iraqis and injured at least two others they claimed were selling weapons at a street market in Saddam Hussein's home town, Tikrit, yesterday.
It happened after senior officers said they were scaling down the iron-fisted way their forces have been policing the country, which has alienated even moderate Iraqis.
I have no idea whether gun-dealers are extremist or moderate, but now they're probably alienated as well.
That is, if they're not dead, of course.
Quote:
....Snipers were placed around the market in Tikrit after the Americans heard that weapons and ammunition were sold there every Friday, Lieutenant Colonel Steve Russell of the 22nd Infantry Regiment said.
I would like to see if they implemented the same market control mechanisms at USA gun-shows.
Quote:
.....It seems that the men were not given a warning or a chance to surrender.

"We did not give them the chance to engage," Col Russell said, standing next to a cache of weapons and ammunition laid out on a tarpaulin.
Damn right. The bastards might have actually surrendered !

And everyone knows that one of those evil defence lawyers might even have gotten them off !
Hats off for good police work !
:banghead:
Quote:
.....He showed identity cards which, he said, linked the men to old regime.
OOoooooooooo, that makes it all perfectly alright then.
Quote:
"When people pick up weapons and carry them freely they become combatants and we will engage them," he added.
Yes, especially when they are your British allies, who will get blown to pieces inside their APC's by American fighter/bombers.
Yes, indeedy.
Quote:
"I think we sent out a strong message today that you cannot walk around the streets with weapons."
Let those Brits know we mean business ! Yes !
Those Brits are only Europeans, anyway.
Quote:
It was an unfortunate start to the new "softly softly" approach the US commanders claim to be adopting.
um, yes.
Quote:
On Thursday Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez, head of the allied forces in Iraq, said the US had decided to revise its strategy and limit the scope of raids after being warned they were alienating the public.
Yes indeedy. Better to kill them than alienate them.

Tum tum tiddley om tum tum, can someone --- anyone --- please tell me WHY IS THE USA SUDDENLY ACTING AS THOUGH ALL IT WANTED TO DO WAS MAKE ONE OF JONATHON SWIFT'S MORE SAVAGE PARODIES INTO REALITY ?

Failing that, I recommend you stay away from all gun markets.
Especially if you're British.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 04:21 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 6,303
Default

While I think it is unfortunate that anyone is being killed in Iraq, you do need to remember that there were multiple fair warnings for several weeks that anyone posessing a gun without authority would be considered an enemy combatant and there was the very well-publicized day when all Iraqis were supposed to give up their guns, so most likely these men were knowingly risking their lives.
Arken is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 04:29 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Arken

While I think it is unfortunate that anyone is being killed in Iraq, you do need to remember that there were multiple fair warnings for several weeks that anyone posessing a gun without authority would be considered an enemy combatant and there was the very well-publicized day when all Iraqis were supposed to give up their guns, so most likely these men were knowingly risking their lives.
Not even in the USA do they apply the automatic death penalty yet.

Oh, and BTW, gun-ownership and usage is very common in Iraq, especially now because there's not enough civil or even military policing, with consequent widespread looting, theft, rape and violence.
And guess just why there's not enough policing ?
Because Rumsfeld wanted to do everything on the cheap, with sexily few troops with max sexy weapons and min foot-beat control, is why.
_______

Oh and for all you Libertarians who claim owning guns is necessary to stop those evil dictatorial Guvments you so love to loathe, gun ownership was very common in Iraq before Saddam's fall.

_______

Hey, hey, hey ----- where's that apologist who whined because I used the common definition of "extrajudicial", rather than the definition from Black's Law Dictionary ?
And objected merely because I pointed out that the USA is making up its own rules as it goes along, in contempt of international law or fair judicial process ?
Yoooohhooooooo, apologist, step right forward and center.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 04:33 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 6,303
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gurdur
Not even in the USA do they apply the automatic death penalty yet.
Generally, in a combat situation, 'the automatic death penalty' is exactly what either side applies. Again, it was made perfectly clear that anyone found in posession of a gun would be treated as an enemy combatant. I think the issue here is not that people were shot, but the reason they are being declared so. I think you really need to attack the whole gun ownership ban rather than people getting shot for owning them. That's the real problem.
Arken is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 04:38 PM   #5
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Arken

Generally, in a combat situation,
Merely defining something as a "combat situation" does not necessarily reasonably make it one.

Otherwise I could simply define it as a "kangeroo", and it would hop.

Quote:
....as an enemy combatant.
See above: I define them as kangeroos. Just as valid.

Quote:
I think the issue here is not that people were shot, but the reason they are being declared so. I think you really need to attack the whole gun ownership ban rather than people getting shot for owning them. That's the real problem.
Uh, no.
The real problem is the neocons' wild ideas on sexy new warfare on the cheap, and complete refusal to satistafactorily provide for infrastructure rebuilding and adequate policing.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 04:41 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 3,316
Angry

Come on - not like there is an economy so these people can do much more!

Yeah there are hungry people that need to be fed. What are we supposing these guys do? Pretend they are all legal and die? US went in there, they are yet to offer these people a freaking option yet somehow it is always someone elses fault. I sometimes wish there is something like a Judgement Day just so we all get to know just how does it feel. Once you are cornered what are they supposed to do?

Consider this - someone is willing to destroy your country, occupy it, plunder the resources and not even giving a damn about anything resembling option let alone restitution.

Why, oh why do the hate us, I wonder? All we do is help them!
Kat_Somm_Faen is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 05:04 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Until recently, Baghdad
Posts: 1,365
Default

For once in my life, I agree with Gurdur, except for his use of the adjective "sexy". It is not strong enough language. I prefer erotic versus "sexy".
Blixy Sticks is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 08:56 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: East Aroura, Ny(Outside Buffalo) USA
Posts: 209
Default

Ok, so two gun dealers were shot, without a chance to surrender, in public.

The validity of going after gun dealers may be an important issue, but the question in my mind is this: What was it like before the 'softer' approach?
Nothingseen is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 09:00 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Default

Are not supporters of gun-rights in USA going to protest?
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 08-09-2003, 09:03 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Spudtopia, ID
Posts: 5,315
Default

I understand why the US military wants to disarm the Iraqis but is it the responsible thing to do? Seriously, Iraq is overflowing with highway robbers, looters and murderers. Shouldn't the people some way of defending themselves? Especially when you consider that there is no police force to speak of.
ex-idaho is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.