Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-05-2002, 03:39 PM | #1 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
|
More sub-optimal designs in medicine
Well I learned a few intriguing things in class today in regards to human anatomy and evolution:
1. We have a connection between the venous blood of our nasal cavity and our brain. This is usually not a good thing, since it allows infections of our nose/eyes/mouth to spread up into our brains and get menigitis. So why do we have this connection? Well, animals that have to run a long ways (such as antelope) use this connection (called the cavernous sinus) to cool their blood so their brain doesn't fry every time they sprint away from a predator. So our blood supply in our head is sub-optimal because we evolved from such creatures. From my Moore's anatomy book, Clinically Oriented Anatomy: Quote:
Why is this important? Again, from Moore's: Quote:
3. Our ability to talk, which is clearly an evolutionary advantage for our species (at least it used to be, before we invented talk shows ) is not designed as optimally as it could be. In order for us to have a "talking" larynx, our respiratory system had to be compromised. Chimpanzees (as well as human babies) can breathe and swallow simultaneously, because the epiglottis extends all the way to the soft palate. As the larynx grows longer, however, (which it has to do to allow us to talk), the epiglottis moves inferior. Thus, we can't breathe and swallow at the same time. In addition, this jury-rigged design makes it easy for us to aspirate or choke, and die. scigirl |
||
11-05-2002, 04:10 PM | #2 | ||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
|
Here are some relevant pubmed articles:
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=160531 9&dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">Homology and evolution of the orbitotemporal venous sinuses of humans.</a> Quote:
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=156437 8&dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">The paranasal sinuses and other enigmas: an aquatic evolutionary theory.</a> Quote:
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=881682 3&dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">Two new forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in a protochordate and the evolutionary implications.</a> Quote:
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=841246 2&dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">The vertebrate larynx: adaptations and aberrations.</a> Quote:
Quote:
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=942261 5&dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">The human aerodigestive tract and gastroesophageal reflux: an evolutionary perspective.</a> Quote:
[ November 05, 2002: Message edited by: scigirl ]</p> |
||||||
11-05-2002, 06:05 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orient, OH USA
Posts: 1,501
|
Excellent. What other scientific theory has as much supporting evidence as evolution?
Bubba <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" /> <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" /> |
11-05-2002, 06:05 PM | #4 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Some of that jargon can be difficult to follow; I gather from that last one that our larynx and throat architecture is not well-adapted for efficient vomiting.
As to size exaggeration, could that be a function of the manes of lions, certain deer, and some other species? |
11-05-2002, 06:27 PM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
Quote:
You physicists should be ashamed. Biologists have a pretty good idea about the scientific explanation for life itself, and physicists haven't even properly worked out why people fall over yet. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|