FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-24-2002, 11:48 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
Post The origin of Elohim

This came up in an EoG discussion, and I'm interested to see different opinions on it:

From Nectaris
Quote:
Hi Diana,
My basic source is Tim Callahan’s, Secret Origins of the Bible . Which is probably not postable per se. I could give you references, page numbers and the like tomorrow or the next day.

However, since I don’t have that handy at work, I’ll just go through some of my reasoning, and if you have any objections to specific statements or need an appropriate reference, let me know. If anything needs corrections, please let me know.

One easy answer, that doesn’t even get to Judaism, is that the Canaanite pantheon of Elohim did create the world in seven generations, according to Canaanite mythology. However I was trying to give the impression that there was a connection between the Canaanite gods Elohim and the Hebrew god Elohim.

The land of Israel was, during a period of time when the Hebrews were more or less homesteading, occupied by Canaanites, who worshipped a father god by the name of EL (hence IsraEL = land of EL). The entire pantheon of the Canaanites was called the Elohim. Both EL and Elohim are often used in the OT to name god, along with El-Shaddai (El-almighty) and YHWH.

The Canaanite creation myth was based on the Sumerian creation myth of deities also referred to as Elohim or, more often, Enuma Elish. The Sumerian and Canaanite myths both stated that the world was created by seven generations of deities, starting with AN or EL and leading through six more generations of deities, who created the universe in more or less the same order as described in Genesis 1:1 through 2:3. The seventh generation, having the easiest job.

The fact that the Hebrew word used to describe the creation day in Genesis could also mean generation, is another factor, but not too much of one. I do not think it would be too far of a stretch to look at the similarities and commonness of names to suggest that the Hebrews borrowed heavily from the creation myths of earlier and contemporaneous religions.

Just a quick Strong’s Concordance from bible.crosswalk.com:

The word used in Genesis for day is YOWN, and I don’t think I can accurately depict the Hebrew symbol, but according to Strong’s the word has the following meanings (notice d).

1. day, time, year
a. day (as opposed to night)
b. day (24 hour period)
1. as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1
2. as a division of time 1b
c. a working day, a day's journey
d. days, lifetime (pl.)
e. time, period (general)
f. year
g. temporal references
1. today
2. yesterday
3. tomorrow

Callahan proposes that at the time Genesis was written that the bible did not use the word to mean “lifetime” but actually meant day, however the original creation story upon which Genesis was based did use the concept of generational gods in a creation process. This is from memory, so I’ll have to go back and read the pertinent parts.

Does this mean that the followers of the Abrahamic religions today believe in a polytheistic generational creation story, no. At one point did they, maybe. At one time was there a doctrinal shift, you got me.

There are also some hints in the bible such as the quote from Genesis 1:26, and also another from Genesis 2:4


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are the GENERATIONS of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Capitalization my own)
Here it’s interesting to note that is a different word used for generations according to Strong's.

I don’t know if I provided you with enough stuff. I will admit I don’t have the source material to give to you but I will try to provide that for you in the next day or so.

They’re letting me off work early, and most of today/tomorrow will be filled with festivities of one form or another. I will provide further documentation, at least to some quotes from Callahan’s book or other materials of some kind. . .

Dave
d
diana is offline  
Old 12-24-2002, 03:51 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
Post

“The Canaanite creation myth was based on the Sumerian creation myth of deities also referred to as Elohim or, more often, Enuma Elish. “


Huh? Enuma Elish means ‘when on high’ it is the first words of the poem. Ancient documents are often named by using the opening line as a title, it is also referred to as ‘the 7 tablets of creation’ you can read it here, they use a standard translation Stephany Dalley I believe. When you are done let us know how much you think it parallels the Genesis myth.

<a href="http://www.theologywebsite.com/etext/enuma/enuma.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.theologywebsite.com/etext/enuma/enuma.shtml</a>

I often took it on faith as well when I read somewhere that "oh, story X is 'just like' story Y"
until I read both stories myself, the only real similarity I see is that both stories say 'the gods made the earth & people' as does every creation story on Earth, otherwise it wouldn't be a creation story.

[ December 24, 2002: Message edited by: marduck ]</p>
Marduk is offline  
Old 12-24-2002, 04:08 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
Angry

I have lost all patience with ‘historians’ with an agenda, be they theist or atheist, just the facts please.
I want Joe Friday to make the comparisons.
Marduk is offline  
Old 12-24-2002, 07:27 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
Post

I know that there are some people who love to equate Elohim with aliens(which they believed is the creator of mankind). I wonder how accurate their guess is?
Answerer is offline  
Old 12-25-2002, 06:56 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
Cool

“I wonder how accurate their guess is?”


Sometimes I wonder myself, the idea makes for intriguing speculation not to mention sci-fi, and It would explain a lot:

The origin of the plethora of stories from around the world of ‘gods’ coming to Earth from the sky.
The habit of so many ancient writers to credit these gods with teaching people how to do almost everything but chew gum and walk at the same time. ‘The gods gave us this, the gods taught us that yadda yadda yadda.’
All this stuff about so and so being taken to ‘heaven’ in a whirlwind or flaming chariot.
Peculiar verses from old text like one of the Apocrypha of Abraham “I was taken into the air by beings as if with wings, to a great ship which rotated on its own axis”
I particularly like the story in the Atrahasis about how the lesser gods go on strike because their work is ‘too much’. To placate the rabble-rousers the higher gods create humans to do the grunt work.
“We will make a primitive man” they nailed that one.
Marduk is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 11:52 PM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 452
Default

I think the flawed part in this argument is insisting that Elohim was the Enuma Elish. El is a god in the Canaanite pantheon, and gods were not directly carried over from Sumer. The creation story was probably the same in Canaanite mythology, that's the part I agree on. I think there was a strong influence for it in the region, especially because when you take over someone else's land, Canaan, like every culture has done at one time or another, the people there don't all just pack up and get out of there. Some of them stay and get mixed in with the other culture's populace. Plus, the Israelite tribes were based in Mesopotamia throughout all of the Bible, and one would assume that is their home region.

I have a strong belief that the Abrahamic religions themselves came from Sumer, along with Abraham. The creation story has some differences with Genesis, but not much. If you look at the Enuma Elish, it goes to name multiple gods one after the other. In Genesis, this is done with Adam's sons. The thing that really hit me hard was seeing an old illustration from a book called Paradisi in Sole Paradisus Terrestris which places Eden and the 4 rivers right smack in Sumer. If you don't believe me, I'll upload the picture.
Anti-Creedance Front is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 09:26 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
Default

I think the flaw is in using the Enuma Elish at all. There are much more striking similarities in other Sumerian texts:

The 4 Rivers from Eden (Edin means 'pastoral land' in Sumerian) can be found in "Enmmakar and the Gods of Erratta" Which they used as a guide to try and find the region where Eden would have been on a recent TV show "The Real Eden", Somewhere in Northern Iran I believe.
And of courese the flood stuff and how humanity lost its chance at immortality is in "The Epic of Gilgamesh" with some variations.

The Enuma Elish has more or less three parts:
the battle against Tiamat
creating humans to relieve the minor gods of their hard work
and praising Marduk
none of which reads like Genesis.
Marduk is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 02:39 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 452
Default

Yeah, you're right. I always confuse the Enuma Elish with the Epic of Gilgamesh. How much do you study up on this stuff? I want to make a little group for studying it. I am really profoundly interested in it, for both helping out the fanatically religious and for my own knowledge.
Anti-Creedance Front is offline  
Old 01-04-2003, 05:00 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by marduck

The Enuma Elish has more or less three parts:
the battle against Tiamat
creating humans to relieve the minor gods of their hard work
and praising Marduk
none of which reads like Genesis.
With the exception, possibly, of the actiual creation of the world by Marduk, which parallels Genesis 1 quite closely. But the, the creation is only a very small part of Enuma.
semyaza is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 05:00 AM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 70
Default

It seems likely that Genesis 1 was a near-monotheist reply to the origins myths of competing religions, particularly the Mesopotamian. It was probably written during or shortly after the exile.

We see in it that God creates with his word the celestial objects and creatures that were often attributed sacred significance or even godlike powers in other religions. Genesis 1 removes the creation from the realm of the sacred and moves it into the profane. It also places humans distinctly over animals in the order of things.

This seems to show a 'high' theology indicating the believer who wrote it was close to a fully developed monotheism (which should give us a date not earlier than Deutero-Isaiah). A counterpoint here is the "let us" sayings, indicating a pantheon of sorts, but that is a long debate.

- Jan

...who rants and raves every day at Secular Blasphemy
Jan Haugland is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:31 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.