Biff the unclean

Denied…add charges of fraud, violation of truth in advertising and misrepresentation of services offered to the list of crimes defendant is accused of.

JaeIsGod

Haha , you guys crack me up!

Entropic_Gnosis

If it so please the court, I wish to present some information, without bias. I have uncovered some contradictory evidence to the whereabouts and nature of said diety at the time these actions were commited. *presenst the Gnostic texts* Though i am aware that these texts were declaired as heresy they offer a vastly altered view of the defendant. I propose that these texts show that the god in question was, in fact, not omni-max at the time of these atrocities nor has he become so in the intervening years. It is therfore that i humbly suggest that the all objections to the trying of this so called god on the basis of either "unknown purpose" or "infitine divine wisdom" be discarded. Furthermore, if this evidence does indeed prove to be valid then it is well within our rights, as finite beings, to try another finite being. That is all your honor.

keyser_soze

I must protest, for the record, the heavy handed manner in which the judge is overseeing this trial. I humbly submit that the judge should recuse himself from the bench in favour of a more judicially minded represenative.

I think we should allow the defendant to judge his own behaviour.. and also provide appropriate punishment. He seems to be well versed in this area.

Biff the unclean

*present the Gnostic texts*
Aha!!! So he changed his alibi while under oath, hey?! Can't keep his story straight. Add perjury to the ever growing list of offences.

Defiant Heretic

But if it's demonstrated that he is not omnimax, then he cannot be blamed for the actions of Satan.

Perhaps this court should begin focusing on specific examples from exhibit A, specifically crimes that don't rely on omnimax abilities to commit?

Biff the unclean

But if it's demonstrated that he is not omnimax, then he cannot be blamed for the actions of Satan.

Evidence 1:12, a wire tap from the Job file on which can be heard the defendant hiring Satan, a known criminal, to murder Mrs. Job, all the little Jobs and the employees of Job Inc.

Entropic_Gnosis

The evidence points to those events in which we know this so called "god" did hire the known criminal Satan to do his dirty work for him. While this further goes to prove his nature as not omnimax it also shows that in many cases he is responsible for the actions of Satan. Much of these charges, as my estemed coleage Difiant Heretic has suggested, do not depend upon the diety being omnimax and indeed more sense can be made of them if we accept the finite nature of the this "god." I also would like to second the motion that a charge of perjery be added for each case, implied or directly stated, in which the defentant claimed to be omnimax.

Solsticin

Suddenly a loud booming voice fills the court room,

"I AM ABOVE THE LAW!!!"



*think Southpark here guys *

atheist_in_foxhole

I think the court should be aware that the defendant was diagnosed with bipolar disorder in May of 2001.