FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-16-2002, 02:09 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: My own little fantasy world
Posts: 8,911
Unhappy Michael Martin

I am a few chapters into his book "Atheism: A Philosophical Justification," and it's apparent that this book is NOT intended for the layman like me. It requires quite a bit of previous philosophical understanding, and IMO he doesn't write particularly clearly. So I think my trouble with understanding it thus far is attributable to those two factors (probably more the former though).

What I'm wondering is if his other works are at about the same level. I know he's written several pieces that are in the library (I've skimmed over a couple and found them somewhat over my head), as well as the book "The Case Against Christianity." That is a book that I'm interested in reading, but I may hold off on purchasing it for a while if it's a little too advanced for laymen readers.

So, if you have read that particular book, would you say that it's pretty easy to follow for the interested but unlearned reader, or must one have prior experience with the topic?

The only other major atheist book that I've read thus far is Smith's "Atheism: The Case Against God." That was an interesting and easy read. So if you could make your comparisons/contrasts with that book, it would be helpful.

Thanks!

Brian
Brian63 is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 02:29 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 234
Cool

Brian: You should be able to get through "The Case Against Christianity" if you were able to get through Smith's book. I read "The Case..." and was not impressed with the style (if that's the correct word) of his arguments. Good luck.
sidewinder is offline  
Old 02-16-2002, 08:28 PM   #3
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,714
Arrow

I agree with Sidewinder. "A Philosophical Justification ...." and "The Case Against Christianity" are two very different books. The latter is easy to understand, the former almost impossible for someone not trained in that sort of thing. And while Sidewinder wasn't impressed with the style of Martin's arguments in "Case," I think the book is absolutely devastating to traditional Christianity as viewed from the perspective of its dogma.

--Don--
-DM- is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.