rainbow walking

Part I. A PHILOSOPHICAL MODEL OF THE UNIVERSE

In this model I intend to demonstrate a consistency to the event horizon we have classified as the UNIVERSE that includes a direct correlation to General Relativity, Particle Physics, Quantum Mechanics and Cosmology. In as much as I am not a mathematician I will have to content myself with a description based on concepts and language, hence my title above. This model, to be successful, shall have to explain the relationship between observer/events, space/time, and quantum/ macro mechanics.

Please note this is not an attempt to explain ORIGINS, but ACTUALITIES, nor is it an attempt to predict anything more than a single POSSIBILITY.

The model I will use is actually a strata of models stacked as a re-circulation process of continuity maintaining a balance or Steady-State universe, (though not in the conventional sense of that concept). The configuration I will use is the bubble. The components of a bubble are as follows:

1. Something exterior to it.

2. Something interior to it.

3. The separating film between 1 and 2 above.

The purpose of this model shall focus primarily on number 3 above. In this model I will posit various components of this film as the perceptually observable substance of the Universe, that this film is comprised of four layers of inter-acting forces and materials and that nothingness resides exterior to it while anti-nothingness resides beneath and thru-out its inner layer.

THE STRATEGIC LAYERS OF THE FILM

1. The innermost layer I shall call Anti-space/Hyper-time

2. The second layer I shall call Sub-space/time

3. The third layer, (the one which we percieve) I shall call Space/Time

4. The fourth and final layer I shall call Hyper-space/ Anti-time

These layers form the strata of a process that is un-ending, fluctuating and moving towards a Division. Our particular OBSERVATION point within this film I shall call the Event Horizon.

THE PRIMARIES

1. The primary causative agent of this event horizon is Energy which causes Motion. Energy is the inherent Anti-nothingness underlying and infiltrating all processes and strata of the universe. Energy does not decrease, it is transferred in the process of continuity.

2. The primary effect of energetic motion is the various phases of Space/Time which manifests itself primarily as Gravitation.

3. The primary particle being moved is the Neutron

4. The primary purpose is EXISTENCE (with the understanding that Division is the primary METHOD of effecting this phenomenon.)

THE PARTICULARS

1. In this model I shall postulate:

A. That it should be self-evident that the universe exists and continues to do so.

B. That from this we should be able to conclude non-existence to be a viable possibility.

C. That we should also be able to extrapolate a tentative conclusion that the universe, (without appealing to sentience), must have a purpose for continued existence of an indefinite period of time.

D. That time itself must depend upon existence of something to continue.

E. That we can tentatively include the postulate of number 4 as the foundation of the remainder of this model. Any other philosophical ramifications can be discussed at a later date, it is enough for now to provide a basis to build this model.

2. In this model I shall postulate:

A. That the inner layer, Anti-Space/Hyper-Time and its interaction with the outer layer of Hyper-space/Anti-time, is a continual process resulting from the interaction between 1, 2, and 3 above.

B. That it is comprised entirely of Neutronian anti-matter under tremendous anti-gravitational pressure first forcing it up and through a process of actualizing into sub-space/time.

C. That this anti-gravitational pressure causes the neutron to spin at a velocity faster than the speed of light. This does not violate General Relativity as it pertains only to spin and not to movement in any direction outside of itself. Thus spin explains why gravitation is experienced at greater distances than other forms of energy yet has less immediate effects accounting for Hyper-time which is the slowest gradient of time.

3. In this model I shall further postulate:

A. That this anti-gravitational pressure creates inverted vortexes that are, themselves, spinning at a velocity faster than light speed and that the neutron, as it contacts the inner walls of the vortex begins to spin counter-clockwise to the direction of the vortex creating a gravitational field that interacts with the anti-gravitational flux of the vortex, much like the wheels of two gears when enmeshed, spin in counter directions to one another.

B. That, as the neutron rises up the vortex, spinning at a velocity faster than light speed, it continually picks up and sheds particles and anti-particles, depending on its symmetry , that become its defining characteristics and enters the sub-space/time strata as particle/events that create waves in all other particle/events within its proximity of entry. It may become an atomic structure of any element depending on the loose material caught up with it in the vortex.

C. That these vortexes are themselves caught up in one of the bipolar universe wide gravitational fields causing them to follow patterns defined by its flux .

D. That upon expulsion from the vortex the neutron’s velocity of spin begins to decay as it progresses up through the various strata of the film, its fate determined by its random proximity and subsequent reaction to other particles and forces in its vicinity as its energy is transferred.


4. In this model I shall further postulate:

A. That the “EXPANSION” effect is not caused by the universe expanding but by the motion of stars and galaxies being propelled along flux lines consistent to the universal gravitation field giving the appearance of expansion only.

B. That the space/time curve is evidence of the enormous size of the bubble such that there exists many more galaxies and stars that are not detectable due to the horizon effect of the curvature.

C. That the commonly held version of the “Big Bang” did not occur in one PLACE but actually occurred in an approximate time all over the surface of the bubble producing many galaxies from enormous vortexual VENTS that appear as “Black Holes” in the outer substance of the film.

D. That the residual effect of a stable “black hole” is the emission of energetic waves of particles of “dark matter” that exhibit properties consistent to “air conditioning” the Space/Time strata, that is to say, to the end that maintaining temperature fluctuations that increase the frequency of particle condensation which absorb and transfer the energy of various spectra’s of light into higher frequencies.

E. That the greater the mass of the black hole the faster the particles emitted condense and spin decay occurs with the residual dark matter increase observed.

5. I shall further postulate in this model:

A. That as energy reaches a specific frequency it is sucked back into the sub-strata of anti-space/hyper-time via the same vortexive conduit that emits neutrons out into sub-space/time only its path is one that follows the outer rim of the vortex back into the pool of anti-space,(further energizing the vortex), just as energized neutrons are following an inner path up the vortex and out into sub-space/time, to begin the cycle of transference once again.

B. That black holes are dormant vortexes that were active in spewing out huge quantities of neutrons during the approximate BB phenomenon that occurred all over the film strata.

C. That while they lie dormant in the space/time strata they are actively transferring low frequency energy, (like that which is visible to the naked eye), from the space/time strata back into the anti-space/hyper-time strata thus they are two way vents. It is this vortexual energy transference that creates the effect of dark matter as energy is depleted in the transference from the particles directly associated to the gravitational flux of the black hole due to the tremendous force created by the enormous mass of the black hole phenomenon.

D. That black holes are only one of the processes of cycling matter/energy between the strata of the film.

E. That pressures are regulated and conservation is sustained by this transference process enabling the universe to exist even though the pressures are enormous and fluctuate, their impact on humans is negligible.

Demosthenes

This is all interesting, but you apparently have left out an important part...

what's the point?

rainbow walking

rw: A more majestic view of our existence.

Demosthenes

I find that the standard models in any case give me more than sufficent majestic view of our existence.

I don't see how the your model will promote the majestic perspective, if anything, I find it confusing and besides there's hardly any shred of evidence to support your postulates. So why should we accept it over the other current models?

rainbow walking

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Demosthenes:
I find that the standard models in any case give me more than sufficent majestic view of our existence.

rw: Good, then stick to 'em.

I find it ironic that cosmologist's appear to be making the same blunder men made 400 years ago in assuming a flat earth. Stephen Hawking, in his book "A Brief History Of Time" posits an unanswered question, "Why is the universe so uniform on a large scale? Why does it look the same at all points of space and in all directions? ...yet in the hot big bang model there would not have been enough time since the BB for light to get from one distant region to another, even though the regions were close together in the early universe. According to Relativity, if light cannot get from one region to another, no other information can. So there would be no way in which different regions in the early universe could have come to have the same temperature as each other, unless for some un-explained reason they happened to start out with the same temperature."

The model I've presented answers this question and many more. If the equivalent of a BB was not a single event in a single location but a conglomerate of events all over the globe of the universe at approximately the same time this would explain the consistency.

I don't see how the your model will promote the majestic perspective, if anything, I find it confusing and besides there's hardly any shred of evidence to support your postulates. So why should we accept it over the other current models?[/B]

rw: I'm more than willing to address any confusion and respond to any claims of insufficient evidence to anyone interested enough to be more specific. Let me ask you a simple question. If you suddenly found yourself shrunken down to the size of an ant, how much of the observable horizon would you lose?

Demosthenes

Well if I was shrunk down to the size of an ant, then yeah I'd lose quite a bit, but it doesn't exclude me from performing experiments and constructing theories to explain the world around me.

As for the horizon problem, the theory of inflation is postulated which explains the problem away quite efficiently. The current observations now have given some support to the inflation idea. Indeed as we revise the Big Bang model with the latest insights from the research in quantum gravity we can get inflation out of the model.

we now have sufficent grounds to expect that inflation does hold for the early universe.

You see how we can account for the problem without ever resorting to your model.

Most importantly, what predictions does your model make? And how does the model do a better job than the current one we have?

Laymen's language doesn't do anything, there's hardly any rigor, how do you know if your model's even consistent?

[ August 01, 2002: Message edited by: Demosthenes ]</p>

tronvillain

Perhaps you should start a website on the subject, like every other loony with a bizarre "model."

NialScorva

*blink* *blink*