Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-21-2002, 02:47 AM | #41 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,315
|
Quote:
|
|
08-24-2002, 05:10 PM | #42 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
The question was indeed whether the Jews took their Bible as literal truth. That is when you claimed that the bible had not been written yet. For the rest I don't know what you are talking about. |
|
08-24-2002, 05:14 PM | #43 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
He was certainly not omniscient. He was dead wrong. [ August 24, 2002: Message edited by: NOGO ]</p> |
|
08-24-2002, 09:51 PM | #44 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,315
|
Quote:
I'm curious though how you can be so sure that he said what you say he did, and also that you can be so sure that he meant it the way you seem to think he did. |
|
08-25-2002, 03:48 PM | #45 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
Which Jesus are we talking about? If you mean the one as described in the Gospels then I would say no. If, on the other hand, you admit that there are things in the gospels that are fictitious then I would say that I have no problem with an historical Jesus. Frankly, I do not believe that Jesus, if he existed, actually said what is described in Matthew 24. However, whoever wrote Mt24 meant to say that Jesus would return within that generation. Paul believed this as well, as did all early Christians. Do you contest the fact that Mt24 says that the generation will not pass until all these things take place? Part of "all these things" was the end of the world and Jesus' return. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|