FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2003, 07:01 PM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: southern california
Posts: 1,002
Default

Wait, you can't read my mind when I post a smilie?

you said

"How about this: the bible wasn't written or even inspired by god. It was concocted by a bunch of goatherders who were fucked in the head, and who you feel sorry for because they were your ancestors. Because of this, you elevate them to the status of your deity, because you can't live without your pathetic fairy tale. How about that? Was I close? Be honest now."

I was saying, damn that's harsh.

But I like it.
cydonia is offline  
Old 07-10-2003, 08:26 PM   #62
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,082
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Sorry, doesn't work that way - Jesus already had eternal bliss before coming to Earth. You get nothing out of this that you didn't already have.
So what you're saying is that three days away from "eternal bliss" is sufficient to qualify Jesus's death and ressurection as a sacrifice?

So, if you could guarantee that I would be returned to the state in which I am now, then if I died for three days I would have made the same sacrifice as Jesus did. Why can't you see that because you claim Jesus is alive and in heaven, that means that you're claiming he's not actually dead or in hell?

I still think it's telling that you admire the idea of a sacrifical scapegoat so much, though. Can you explain why you worship a God who has an absolute and unchanging requirement for the torture and death of an innocent person before he can forgive people? For that matter, what on earth do you think words like "mercy" and "forgive" actually mean?

What's wrong with a system where people accept responsibility for their own actions? Why on earth do you think that you should you be punished because of what I do? If you don't, why do you think other people should be made to pay for my mistakes?

What's wrong with a system where children are protected from rapists and murderers? No, seriously. I want to know why you think God's system is so wonderful when it skips this very important detail. (Note: As you've explained on many occasions, God will not intervene to protect a child if that would take away the free will of a serial killer. I'm still wondering why you approve of this.)

Why do you consider it "arrogant" to demand those two simple things? Is there something wrong with wanting to be accountable for my own actions?
orac is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 07:31 PM   #63
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Default

I know a better way than how God handled it.

christ died for the sins of mankind thus redeeming it.
Ok.
then God should have immediately raptured entire mankind at that moment so as to stop them from committing more sins.
Everyone in heaven! Ta da!
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 07-11-2003, 08:28 PM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by cydonia
Wait, you can't read my mind when I post a smilie?

you said

"How about this: the bible wasn't written or even inspired by god. It was concocted by a bunch of goatherders who were fucked in the head, and who you feel sorry for because they were your ancestors. Because of this, you elevate them to the status of your deity, because you can't live without your pathetic fairy tale. How about that? Was I close? Be honest now."

I was saying, damn that's harsh.

But I like it.
Cool, I get it now! Thanks!
winstonjen is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.