Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Jimmy Higgins · 10-25-2002, 09:14 AM

Every once in a while, I think I come up with a good idea against ID. Usually isn't too good, but hear me out, its short.

ID runs on a simple presupposition, it ain't natural.

However, hasn't the vast majority of scientific experiments done by man been done under the assumption that the tested process is natural and can be quantified. This has been proven again, again, and even again!

Isn't ID doing something wrong when it decides to ignore this?

10-25-2002, 09:14 AM	#1
Jimmy Higgins Contributor Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Proud Citizen of Freedonia Posts: 42,473	ID and the critical presupposition Every once in a while, I think I come up with a good idea against ID. Usually isn't too good, but hear me out, its short. ID runs on a simple presupposition, it ain't natural. However, hasn't the vast majority of scientific experiments done by man been done under the assumption that the tested process is natural and can be quantified. This has been proven again, again, and even again! Isn't ID doing something wrong when it decides to ignore this?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.