Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
08-02-2002, 04:52 AM | #1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
|
Retroviruses Shows That Human-Specific Variety Developed When Humans, Chimps Diverged
Sorry, I haven't had much time for discussion lately, but I do try to keep up with the news so here's an interesting article:
<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/08/020802075138.htm" target="_blank">Retroviruses Shows That Human-Specific Variety Developed When Humans, Chimps Diverged</a> |
08-02-2002, 05:38 AM | #2 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That's a very interesting article, MrD. I just wish, however, that when people write this sort of thing up they would be a bit tighter with their language:
Quote:
|
|
08-02-2002, 05:56 AM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
|
I'm inclined to forgive them because earlier in the same article they say, "at the same time humans and chimps are believed to have diverged from a common ancestor" and "human-specific retroviruses emerged at the same time other researchers believe humans and chimps diverged".
|
08-02-2002, 06:31 AM | #4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
|
Very interesting. Thanks for the link.
|
08-04-2002, 08:58 AM | #5 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
Since they do have a fuction does this weaken the case from molecular genetics? "Can "errors" in modern species be used as evidence of "copying" from ancient ancestors? In fact, the answer to this question appears to be "yes," since recent molecular genetics investigations have uncovered some examples of the same "errors" present in the genetic material of humans and apes. To understand these findings it is necessary to know a little about DNA, the chemical molecule in which genetic information is stored." <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/molgen/" target="_blank">http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/molgen/</a> If they do, in fact, have a fuction, are they still errors? [ August 04, 2002: Message edited by: tgamble ] {edited to fix link - scigirl} [ August 04, 2002: Message edited by: scigirl ]</p> |
|
08-04-2002, 09:42 AM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Useless Bay
Posts: 1,434
|
I have a question for one of you who knows more about this stuff than I do: Did these viruses come from inside the body, born from mutations of our own genes, or did they come from outside the body and incorporate themselves into the genes? Or both?
|
08-04-2002, 09:52 AM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
|
Quote:
|
|
08-04-2002, 10:13 AM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Useless Bay
Posts: 1,434
|
thanks for the link.
|
08-04-2002, 10:38 AM | #9 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dana Point, Ca, USA
Posts: 2,115
|
I have been long impressed with <a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/18/10254#Top" target="_blank">this Johnson&Coffin paper on EHRVs</a>.
I haven't yet taken the time to study this new idea of retroviruses promoting differentiation at taxa higher than bacteria. Lateral transfer in multicellular organisms? Big idea if it is real, but, homerun hitters also strike out at lot (other than Bonds that is). |
08-04-2002, 01:16 PM | #10 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Does anyone have any clue about the origin of viruses in general? Or are most viruses too stripped-down to give any clear clues about their origins?
And what I mean by origin is which non-virus ancestors that viruses are descended from. [ August 04, 2002: Message edited by: lpetrich ]</p> |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|