FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-11-2002, 05:27 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 1,626
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by Sole Controller:
<strong> Once we wean ourselves from the gods, we can began living our lives for us, the human race.
</strong>
I disagree with this statement. I do not feel that believing in God it takes away from living the lives we do. I still try to help out other humans, I care for people. I do not do the things I do as some sort of bargaining chip for heaven. Whether one believes in God or not does not take away from living for the human race...

Sole Controller why do you feel we would have to be weaned away from God before we can live for the human race?
Amie is offline  
Old 12-11-2002, 05:58 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Eudaimonist:
<strong>

I don't want the world ruled by human beings, much less gods, if rule means control over people's destinies. I'd rather create my own destiny. (This isn't why I don't believe in the existence of gods, but I'll admit this emotional disposition.)

BTW, who is Sharur?

[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: Eudaimonist ]</strong>
I suppose it is only human to want to create your own destiny. But for me it's different. I would much prefer for the decision to be made by someone else, with myself only having a sort of veto power to refuse an undesirable destiny. I think it's an unusual assumption of modern culture that this is an undesirable thing. And I suppose I was questioning this.

Sharur is the main character in Between the Rivers by Harry Turtledove. In this book, the gods of Mesopotamia exist and are absolute monarchs of the various city-states. But in Sharur's city, Gibil, humans have more freedom than in other cities, and Sharur does whatever it takes to keep it that way, including an act of deicide at the end. Atheists might well like this book; I enjoy it aesthetically, but think it sends all kinds of wrong messages about gods.
Ojuice5001 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.