Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Valentine Pontifex · 03-07-2002, 09:12 PM

Randman,

Please look at the following AiG short article by their superstar Jonathan Sarfati:

<a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/248.asp" target="_blank">http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/248.asp</a>

Do you think this is cutting edge science?

In particular Sarfati has some quotes for you:

Quote:

As the evolutionist astronomers Clark and Caswell say, �Why have the large number of expected remnants not been detected?� and these authors refer to �The mystery of the missing remnants�.

So what do you think, a paragon of science? Or just more YEC nonsense? I really want an answer.

To everyone who knows what I am getting at at know what is wrong with this AiG article, keep your mouth (keyboard) quite for a bit. Let him learn the hard way.

If you are serious about doing research, you can check the <a href="http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1976MNRAS.174..267C&db_key= AST&page_ind=0&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type= SCREEN_GIF" target="_blank">article that Sarfati quoted</a>. Hint: context.
Another hint: you really don't need to know any of the technical terms to see the problem...

Vorkosigan · 03-07-2002, 11:55 PM

I love the begging for a handout at the bottom, too. Classic.

Michael

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

03-07-2002, 11:55 PM	#2
Vorkosigan Contributor Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Barrayar Posts: 11,866	I love the begging for a handout at the bottom, too. Classic. Michael

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.