FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-24-2003, 09:55 AM   #71
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
I'm sure we agree with you Scombrid, given certain sweeping assumptions. The question which goes unanswered is how these could have been avoided in the first place by more godly people, or why these things exist at all. Nor does your theory answer how some people are "luckier" than others. You cannot fairly assert that natural processes explain everything, and then just attribute anomalies to "good luck."

God's plan was trashed long ago IMO, but a "passive plan" might include one or more of the following:

1. People don't drink and look for sex in huge numbers, so slimy night-club owners don't have unsafe clubs to keep open. During the "Great Awakening" salloons were mostly empty.

2. There is no space shuttle, or crews pray before designing/installing insulation. Engineers and managers never become arrogant, nor do they simply say "There was no way to get the crew home if the tiles were damaged, so we won't bother inspecting them." Is that what Gene Cranz said about Apollo 13? It was "impossible" to get Apollo 13 home, but a "miracle" solution was devised.

3. There are no Toys R Us because parents don't buy billions of toys as passifiers for children, or God's preferred building codes make such a disaster impossible, or people have more active consciences so that they keep the roof clean.

I could go on with examples where your theory falls short. What if Arnold's plot wasn't discovered when it was? How was it discovered without, as Washington said, the help of Providence? You cannot explain a thousand turn of events which benefitted mankind. You cannot prove that God doesn't help when and where he can, or in major historic events. You cannot explain dumb luck. You cannot negate the evidence that gangs make peace when Christians intercede even though we cannot prove it. You cannot prove that God doesn't allow certain disasters and prevent others. You can try to show he is too arbitrary, but that's about it.

And of course you can't prove that God intended such a world as ours, and I think the Biblical evidence is overwhelming that he never would have, but he still tries to do what he can. If we have reached the spiritual point where only suffering causes us to turn to God, then it makes no sense at all for God to alleviate it anyway.

And even you must admit we are at the mercy of circumstances created by us and our own decisions- crappy roofs, terrible shuttle designs IMO without a protective crew compartment which would have saved the Challenger crew (left out of design to save weight as it turns out). Yes these are "natural" events in one way- but the natural result of our own choices which leave God very little wiggle room.

Some skeptics here would effectively assert we can build airplanes out or scap iron, and God should keep all the passengrs safe anyway. That is a fair conclusion from some arguments made here.

He could say "I'm not letting you build a space shuttle because people will get killed and you should be spending the money on better buildings" but nobody would listen. At least not now.

Rad
Gods building codes? God has no "wiggle room"? People who go to clubs to see shows are really there for drinking and sex in "huge numbers"?

Theres no point trying to talk to this guy anymore. Lyricist was right about Radorth.
Yellum Notnef is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 10:24 AM   #72
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
Default

From Rad: “And even you must admit we are at the mercy of circumstances created by us and our own decisions- crappy roofs, terrible shuttle designs IMO without a protective crew compartment which would have saved the Challenger crew (left out of design to save weight as it turns out). Yes these are "natural" events in one way- but the natural result of our own choices which leave God very little wiggle room.”

This leads to an intriguing scenario in which engineers ask god’s guidance when building space shuttles: they’d be selected, presumably, on the strength of their religious convictions rather than their scientific/engineering expertise, and I’d really like to hear their excuses when their Christian Shuttle turns into a ball of flame because god forgot to mention that fuel pipes need to be made from a heat-resistant, non-corrosive material rather than plastic tubing.

That god causes disasters in order to punish us is a primitive belief which has passed its sell-by date; it is a pointless complication and does not help move mankind towards taking a mature responsibility for its behaviour and actions.
We don’t need a god to tell us that greed and laxity are wrong; we can see where they lead and this practical experience hones our morality. Don’t let’s forget that Christian morality was quite happy with burning witches, torturing heretics, killing pagans and capturing, shipping and owning slaves. I read here at Infidels that nearly all the key players in the great (and not so great) financial scandals which have cost ordinary Americans billions of dollars - robbing many of their life savings - were church-going Christians.
We have nothing to learn from Christian morality, except to be wary of it.
What we do have is the ability to investigate, analyse and understand why things go wrong so that similar mistakes can be avoided in future.
Stephen T-B is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 10:40 AM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
Default

I’d like to comment on Fiach’s remark that: ...“the atrocities in the Old testament were not the acts of an imaginary god, but of evil savage nomads using God as the excuse.”
I think scholars will increasingly show us that many, if not most, of those OT atrocities never happened. I suspect they were highly-embellished tales gathered up by the leaders of a relatively weak and insecure people for morale-boosting reasons.
If they were understood to be folk tales and myths, perhaps modern-day hatreds among the Semite peoples could at last be laid to rest.
The Bible has a lot to answer for.
Stephen T-B is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 10:41 AM   #74
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Heart of Dixie
Posts: 104
Default

Engineers and managers never become arrogant, nor do they simply say "There was no way to get the crew home if the tiles were damaged, so we won't bother inspecting them." Is that what Gene Cranz said about Apollo 13? It was "impossible" to get Apollo 13 home, but a "miracle" solution was devised.

******

Actually, it was Gene Kranz, and he never uttered the phrase "Failure is Not an Option" during the actual mission, although it made for a cool book title.

The Apollo 13 rescue was a brilliant example of human ingenuity at its best. Engineers working collectively to solve a problem. I would think that if god had been around, he would have notified the flight team that the oxygen tank in the service module was faulty and needed to be replaced BEFORE the mission began.

However, no matter how valiant the effort, we are limited to the physical laws of this universe. If the heat sheild had failed during the Apollo 13 mission (as it did on Columbia's last mission), the Apollo crew would have met the same fate as the crew of STS-107.
spacedOut is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 10:52 AM   #75
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth
And of course you can't prove that God intended such a world as ours, and I think the Biblical evidence is overwhelming that he never would have, but he still tries to do what he can.
Radorth, are you suggesting that God can do things that have unintended consequences? Are you saying you don't believe God is omniscient, that he/she/it did not foresee the results of his/her/its creation? (Maybe this really is what you believe--I have to admit you've already surprised me by telling me I need to fear God's malevolence.)
MrDarwin is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 11:04 AM   #76
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 4,183
Default

Amie,
In this thread, you have made three claims (quite passionately, I might add) that seem mutually exclusive to me, and I'm hoping you can clarify it:

1) We have free will
2) Everything happens for a reason
3) Things happen because they are part of God's great plan

It seems to me that theory 1 conflicts with both theory 2 and 3. How do you reconcile these? I'm confused....
thebeave is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 11:15 AM   #77
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Execution State, USA
Posts: 5,031
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by Radorth:

There's really an Easter Bunny?
RADORTH: "Ass mode - ENGAGE!"


Quote:
Did some of them write long narratives about his life on parchment, risk life and limp to preach his Kingdom?
What part of the body is the "limp", again?

Oh. Oh, yuck. Don't answer that.


Quote:
Of course the Mage hasn't sold millions upon millions of books either.
Not millions, but then, I didn't come up with the shrewd marketing concept of forcibly targeting the weak and stupid with my book.

It DID sell a few hundred copies, though, and it had better illustrations to boot.
The Naked Mage is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 11:46 AM   #78
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,759
Default

Quote:
I'm sure we agree with you Scombrid, given certain sweeping assumptions. The question which goes unanswered is how these could have been avoided in the first place by more godly people, or why these things exist at all. Nor does your theory answer how some people are "luckier" than others. You cannot fairly assert that natural processes explain everything, and then just attribute anomalies to "good luck."

God's plan was trashed long ago IMO, but a "passive plan" might include one or more of the following:

1. People don't drink and look for sex in huge numbers, so slimy night-club owners don't have unsafe clubs to keep open. During the "Great Awakening" salloons were mostly empty.
But the godly could go to bed after having faithfully read their Bibles and die in their sleep when the dog kicks over the kerosene heater and the smoke alarm fails.

Statistical anomalies fall well within the view that natural processes explain the world. Do you understand the nature of stochastic events? Such as the reason we can have two 100year storms in one year without violating the assumptions regarding natural events. Often times what looks random on the surface will show a predictable pattern or will occur at some measurable rate. Deviation from the pattern or rate is variance. I once watched 5deer cross a frozen pond. One fell through and died while the others made it. Did that deer not please god? For a given ice thickness, there will be a measurable rate at which deer will fall through, say 1fall per 100crossings. Life sucks if you’re the one. What happens when 2 fall through in 5crossings? Is god out to get the deer? No, it’s equally likely that you’ll go 200crossings without a fall. Luck is a reality, not a cop-out. Our careful observation of the world amounts to reducing the rate of bad event X to an acceptable limit. Variance is the anomaly that bites us. Right now the observed failure rate for the shuttle reentry is something like 1 per 142 (It might be much higher and failure should’ve happened sooner or much lower but with our sample size we’re not positive). We’ve decided that isn’t acceptable and are seeking to alter the design to reduce the rate of reentry failure. Staying home as opposed to going to the club is risk averse only provided that your home is actually safe. Is using a kerosene heater ungodly?


Quote:
2. There is no space shuttle, or crews pray before designing/installing insulation. Engineers and managers never become arrogant, nor do they simply say "There was no way to get the crew home if the tiles were damaged, so we won't bother inspecting them." Is that what Gene Cranz said about Apollo 13? It was "impossible" to get Apollo 13 home, but a "miracle" solution was devised.
Do you assert here that all the successes are god’s covert intervention? How would the engineer distinguish his design ideas from ideas planted by god? If God has reverted to a “passive plan” why is he meddling in the shuttle program?

Quote:
3. There are no Toys R Us because parents don't buy billions of toys as passifiers for children, or God's preferred building codes make such a disaster impossible, or people have more active consciences so that they keep the roof clean.
God gives out building codes. I’ll be sure to contact the engineering and architecture schools at my alma mater and tell them that they’re obsolete. Students need only meditate and the answers will come. My civil engineering friend need not study past bridge designs to understand how the deck interacts with cross winds. God must not have been in on the design process for galloping gurdy. http://www.vibrationdata.com/Tacoma.htm .

Quote:
I could go on with examples where your theory falls short. What if Arnold's plot wasn't discovered when it was? How was it discovered without, as Washington said, the help of Providence? You cannot explain a thousand turn of events which benefitted mankind. You cannot prove that God doesn't help when and where he can, or in major historic events. You cannot explain dumb luck. You cannot negate the evidence that gangs make peace when Christians intercede even though we cannot prove it. You cannot prove that God doesn't allow certain disasters and prevent others. You can try to show he is too arbitrary, but that's about it.
I don’t need to prove that god doesn’t intercede in disasters. God’s involvement in natural events is contraindicated by the fact that human action and decisions affect the effects of various events on human lives. Did god give us satellites so that we can evacuate low lying areas in anticipation of a Hurricane or are we thwarting god’s will by mitigating storm damage. In that vein, god must hate Baptists given that they’re the denomination most affected by Tornadoes.

Quote:
And of course you can't prove that God intended such a world as ours, and I think the Biblical evidence is overwhelming that he never would have, but he still tries to do what he can. If we have reached the spiritual point where only suffering causes us to turn to God, then it makes no sense at all for God to alleviate it anyway.
I think it amazing that your hypothetical infinite god would have its creation fouled up by finite beings. Gee golly Wally we sure are powerful.



Quote:
And even you must admit we are at the mercy of circumstances created by us and our own decisions- crappy roofs, terrible shuttle designs IMO without a protective crew compartment which would have saved the Challenger crew (left out of design to save weight as it turns out). Yes these are "natural" events in one way- but the natural result of our own choices which leave God very little wiggle room.
Yeah, that’s pretty much it. We are at the mercy of OUR decisions and actions. Experience tells us not to build double decker freeways in earthquake zones or at least the reinforce the damned things properly when we do. Experience and observation of plate tectonics tell us where the earthquake zones are located. Of course just about everywhere is an earthquake zone (http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/prepare/factsheets/NewMadrid/) it’s just a matter of frequency of occurrence. In areas where the rate of quakes renders the daily chance of a quake sufficiently low, we take the risk of building structures without earthquake resilience in mind.


Quote:
Some skeptics here would effectively assert we can build airplanes out or scap iron, and God should keep all the passengrs safe anyway. That is a fair conclusion from some arguments made here.
No. That is the image of god projected by theists when they assert that our own failings would’ve been prevented if only we’d asked god.
scombrid is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 11:50 AM   #79
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,759
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by spacedOut
The Apollo 13 rescue was a brilliant example of human ingenuity at its best. Engineers working collectively to solve a problem. I would think that if god had been around, he would have notified the flight team that the oxygen tank in the service module was faulty and needed to be replaced BEFORE the mission began.

God just wanted to make things interesting, like a satiated cat playing with a live mouse just for kicks.
scombrid is offline  
Old 02-24-2003, 11:52 AM   #80
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 3,197
Default

You'd think that if God really loved His children, He'd protect them from harm. Nooo. He has to play this silly mind game to feed His power trip: worship me or I'll smite you.
Bree is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:21 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.