FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2002, 10:07 AM   #21
K
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,485
Post

Amos:

So omnibenevolence doesn't exist in heaven? That doesn't sound very OMNI to me.
K is offline  
Old 09-01-2002, 12:24 PM   #22
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by K:
<strong>Amos:

So omnibenevolence doesn't exist in heaven? That doesn't sound very OMNI to me.</strong>
Do you really think that the supernatural exist in nature?
 
Old 09-01-2002, 02:32 PM   #23
K
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,485
Post

Amos:

I don't believe the supernatural exists anywhere.
K is offline  
Old 09-01-2002, 06:20 PM   #24
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by K:
<strong>Amos:

I don't believe the supernatural exists anywhere.</strong>
So then why should omnibenevolence exist in heaven?
 
Old 09-01-2002, 07:00 PM   #25
K
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,485
Post

I'm not the one who is asserting the following:

1. There is an omnipotent and omnibenevolent god.

2. That omnipotent and omnibenevolent god allows all the suffering on earth to avoid interfering with our free will.

3. There is free will without suffering in heaven.

These ideas are fundamentally incompatible with each other. I wanted to see if any theists who believe in heaven and a resonable facsimile of the Christian god have a veiw of heaven that is consistent with an omnipotent, omnibenevolent god who is forced to allow suffering on earth.
K is offline  
Old 09-01-2002, 08:19 PM   #26
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by K:
<strong>I'm not the one who is asserting the following:

1. There is an omnipotent and omnibenevolent god.

2. That omnipotent and omnibenevolent god allows all the suffering on earth to avoid interfering with our free will.

3. There is free will without suffering in heaven.

These ideas are fundamentally incompatible with each other. I wanted to see if any theists who believe in heaven and a resonable facsimile of the Christian god have a veiw of heaven that is consistent with an omnipotent, omnibenevolent god who is forced to allow suffering on earth.</strong>
But I just explained that above.

Just compare heaven with water and evil with land and you will see that it makes more sense. You will also know that water is present in land but land is not present in water nor is water present in water. Land can produce plants out of its own free will and is watered by the omnipresence of water.

Suffering is the result of unstructured space in our own mind and that is our own problem. The unstructured space is needed to tell God when to water his flowers and how to best adapt them in a compettitive environment.

Hope it helps.
 
Old 09-01-2002, 09:23 PM   #27
K
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,485
Post

Amos:

I know what each of the words you used means. But the way they were strung together looks like gibberish to me.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're not a troll. Could you please list the fundamental tenets of your beliefs in as simple a form as possible? Without an idea where you're coming from, I really don't think I have a prayer of communicating with you.
K is offline  
Old 09-02-2002, 06:16 AM   #28
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: toronto canada
Posts: 498
Post

Heaven and Hell were concepts used to influence and control peoples behaviour at a time when humans were particularly barbaric.
These concepts are outdated, simplistic, and against reason...

Be seeing you...
dostf is offline  
Old 09-02-2002, 07:28 AM   #29
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by K:
<strong>Amos:

I know what each of the words you used means. But the way they were strung together looks like gibberish to me.

</strong>
Is it maybe the case that they are like gibberish to you because they contradict your preconceived ideas?
 
Old 09-02-2002, 08:55 AM   #30
K
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,485
Post

That may be. That's why I asked you to list your beliefs. Without a common reference point, communication is impossible.
K is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.