FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-03-2003, 08:30 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hell, New York
Posts: 151
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by River
There is Only One Arabic Qur'an ....and Islam is not vitriolic by nature.
I apologize, though any religion that people interpret as good to justify throwing rocks at people until they die...is pretty vitriolic in my opinion.
Aerik Von is offline  
Old 08-03-2003, 09:27 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

Now . . . now . . . they are very small rocks. . . .

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 12:07 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,156
Default

"... and try this one for size. That's craftsmanship, I tell you."

"Can I have one mum - I mean, DAD?"

"Oh all right. I'll take two rocks and a packet of gravel."
fried beef sandwich is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 12:41 AM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

"Are there any women here?"

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 03:03 AM   #15
Iasion
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Arrow waste of time

Greetings River,

you didn't even READ my posts did you?

Just TWICE pasted a passage from your favourite web site's
"Is the Text of the Quran reliable?"
page.

You completely ignored the vast majority of my post - including the actual EVIDENCE in the `aditha of many and various types of textual instability - and then you had the chutzpah to accuse me of not providing evidence!

And you MADE up a false and childish story about a dog chewing on the Quran - are you mad? Dogs are unclean to conservative muslims, the story would horify a devout muslim. As far as I can tell, there was NO such story, you just MADE IT UP and then tried to use it to ridicule me! You are an idiot.

Its a complete waste of time debating with you River, you haven't a clue - good luck with your life :-)

Iasion
 
Old 08-04-2003, 06:34 AM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default Re: waste of time

Quote:
Originally posted by Iasion

You completely ignored the vast majority of my post - including the actual EVIDENCE in the `aditha of many and various types of textual instability - and then you had the chutzpah to accuse me of not providing evidence!

And you MADE up a false and childish story about a dog chewing on the Quran - are you mad? Dogs are unclean to conservative muslims, the story would horify a devout muslim. As far as I can tell, there was NO such story, you just MADE IT UP and then tried to use it to ridicule me! You are an idiot.


Iasion

1) What you posted ...is by far the lamest definition of Evidence one can possibly give. I will only address authentic narrations.

2) Dogs were not always considered unclean. In the Qur'an , there is a passage about the Sleepers and their companion pet dog. And there is another passage where a prostitute gave water to a dying dog and was given entry to Paradise for her "purity" and good action.
River is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 04:05 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

River:

With all due respect, you may think that way, but your statement is just a Poisoning of the Well. To convince us, you are going to have to demonstrate why Iasion's is, ". . . by far the lamest definition of Evidence one can possibly give."

Particularly on a board where members have read "young Earth creationism!"

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 05:01 PM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

I wouldn't be surprised if Iasion was also a YEC....

I would really like to address his post right down to the minute detail...but it is a colossal waste of time...for few here realize that Hadiths have a very thorough system of narration / and verification. How can I explain a language, in one post....that would theoretically be explained in books/stacks? No one speaks the language, here ...thus I dont want to make it as if I speak to the wall. I don't like it when posters start bringing out Hadiths out of thin air. There is more than a couple hundred thousand hadiths. The effort would be painstalkingly exhaustive and belabored. ( and possibly fruitless , especially if no one is listening)
River is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 05:09 PM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,794
Default

It is something the NT people do here all the time when someone makes a strange claim.

Take a deep breath, pick one of his statements, take some time, work through it.

Otherwise, it would be akin to claiming, "tons of evidence exists for Young Earth Creation, and I do not have the time to show it here!"

--J.D.
Doctor X is offline  
Old 08-04-2003, 08:09 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,213
Default

Personally, I wouldn't trust Muslim scholars anymore than I trust Christian scholars.
B. H. Manners is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.