Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-26-2002, 07:40 PM | #21 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 110
|
Quote:
They believed that the apocalypse would happen in 1914. When it didn't they said (as far as I understand) that it really did happen but in some kind of invisible, spiritual way that only they could realize. I've also heard that they moved up the date several times, but I could be thinking of another group. I think their interpretation of it is connected to their being strong believers in apocalyptic events. They've regularly updated their theories over the years about how the end is going to come and what part they're going to play (cuz you know they've got to be in there somewhere). They have very twisty kinds of interpretations for much of their beliefs about what the bible means (including this one, IMO), and rely heavily on the Watchtower for a lot of their interpretations. I don't know how helpful that is, but I gave it a try. |
|
09-26-2002, 07:47 PM | #22 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 110
|
Thanks for posting the pics, gravitybow! I hadn't seen any for a long time and it really cracked me up.
It reminds me of this comedian I heard talking about JW's coming to his door and asking him- "Do you want to live forever in paradise?" He replied- "Not if it's with you!" |
09-27-2002, 03:15 AM | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brandon Canada
Posts: 70
|
There's a book called 'Awakening of a Jehovah's Witness' by Diane Wilson which you might find interesting. It is not well written but the fact that she took about twenty years to break away from the cult and overcome her indoctrination would freeze your blood.
Talking of blood, she has detailed chronology of the 'on again, off again' taboo on transfusions. That's right, the edict has been changed several times over the years by the ruling cabal and so it depended on when you or your child required a transfusion as to whether you were allowed it or not. The length of time she spends trying to de-program herself makes for frustrating reading but the book is worth while for the other insights into the day to day absurdities of the JW belief system. I was particularly taken with the demons. These little guys can be anywhere, in your toaster or your sewing box......they are not all in the bedroom closet by any means! I would be interested to know if Joel or the other ex JW's had similar difficulties in breaking free. |
09-27-2002, 06:01 PM | #24 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC, New York
Posts: 114
|
Actually, the JW's believe that the 144,000 represents "spiritual Isreal", and "gentiles" have been open to the "spiritual priesthood" from the beginning. Of course, they may have had a different explanation for this doctrine before, since they change their theological stand on some issues very often. They also believe the 144,000 need only be "spiritual virgins", i.e.: they present themselves "spiritually undefiled" to Christ (by not being in "false religious practice", I guess). So a member of that class may have sex on earth (inside the godly confines of marriage, of course ).
Oh yeah, you definitely have to be a JW to even be considered one of the 144,000. Hell, non-JW's barely stand a chance of not being destroyed by God at the end of the world . The lack of meat and technology always bothered me too, gravitybow. I just figured we would be so busy doing "godly" stuff, it wouldn't matter. |
09-28-2002, 03:14 AM | #25 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cleveland, OH, USA
Folding@Home Godless Team
Posts: 6,211
|
So, the Noah's flood story is to be taken literally but the Revelations verse can be 'interpreted' as needed.
'We know the answer, the data will be adjusted to fit' |
09-30-2002, 08:03 AM | #26 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington, NC
Posts: 1,696
|
This is from <a href="http://www.religioustolerance.org/heav_hel3.htm" target="_blank">religioustolerance.org</a> :
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have a lot of questions about all this: Why didn't an omnipotent God anoint only those he knew would be faithful, and dispense with this "you're in, now you're out" method? In practice, how were these 8,600 men selected? (I believe I read somewhere they're all men. Correct me if I'm wrong.) Does Brother Bob stand up one day and say, "I'm anointed!"? Does he get elected somehow? How is an increase over 8,600 made known? Does the WTS Governing Body publish "Brothers Steve, Joe Bob, and Earl are unfaithful. Three slots are now open."? Can one be declared unfaithful posthumously? That seems the only way to continue the Lord's Supper sacrament in the decades to come as old geezers expire. Is there a published list of the 8,600 who attend the sacramental meal? Are new members added as old ones die off? Observation: The only way off the 8,600 list is by unfaithfulness. If the Lord's Supper sacrament continues with a new crop of "anointed" after the current iteration passes from this life, then it seems that being anointed is a certificate of unfaithfulness. (edited for spelling) [ September 30, 2002: Message edited by: gravitybow ]</p> |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|