FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2002, 09:36 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 4,369
Post Faith is evil

SingleDad, 99percent, hinduwoman, wherever you may be, I salute you.

Faith (when correctly defined) is evil.
emphryio is offline  
Old 06-04-2002, 09:50 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WV
Posts: 4,369
Post

<a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=21&t=000348" target="_blank">Faith is immoral</a>

I wince to read some of my writings. But I wrote as if the audience was myself. On this particular day I feel as if I should conform more (in regards to writing style) because if you don't conform society simply discards you. At that time I wrote the only way in wish I could care enough to bother.

[ June 04, 2002: Message edited by: emphryio ]</p>
emphryio is offline  
Old 06-04-2002, 09:59 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 77
Wink

Who is Faith, and why are you impugning her in this forum?
ShottleBop is offline  
Old 06-04-2002, 10:09 AM   #4
WJ
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 812
Wink

Indeed! Faith is not logically possible. Therefore, belief does not exist.

The apeman
WJ is offline  
Old 06-04-2002, 05:53 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 163
Post

You assume the existence of anything outside of your mind without any empirical, provable evidence. How dare you faithful, and therefor dangerous immoral people!

~You friendly neighborhood 15yr old Sikh
Ron Singh is offline  
Old 06-04-2002, 07:25 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by sikh:
<strong>You assume the existence of anything outside of your mind without any empirical, provable evidence. How dare you faithful, and therefor dangerous immoral people!
</strong>
You wish to assume nothing exists outside your mind? Go ahead, try it. See what happens. Let us know when you notice anything different.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 06-04-2002, 07:40 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: United States
Posts: 70
Post

Hmm "Faith" is not evil. Mankind on the other hand is.
Ether is offline  
Old 06-04-2002, 08:11 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 163
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft:
<strong>

You wish to assume nothing exists outside your mind? Go ahead, try it. See what happens. Let us know when you notice anything different.</strong>
Are you trying to intice me to do something EVIL? scandelous! I agree with Ether.

~Your friendly neighborhood 15yr old Sikh
Ron Singh is offline  
Old 06-04-2002, 10:32 PM   #9
Synaesthesia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I salute you emphryio in the name of salutation in general,

We should not define 'faith' in terms of "that which is undesirable" It is quite clear that faith can provide very real social and individual benefit. We could just as comfortably take it on faith that it,
like any human endeavor, is occasionally prone to catalyzing truly brilliantly folly.

Good (we should not neglect) does produce evil (when correctly defined). Note that Ether defines mankind in terms of ‘that which is evil’, a closely related equivocation.

Ether comments,
’"Faith" is not evil. Mankind on the other hand is. ‘

But mankind can produce some truly wonderful things. (obligatory list of happy fuzzy fun and uncontroversially good things we have produced <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> ) We are also the ones that make (obligatory list of ways we have invented to churn flesh and steel alike in a inferno that sucks the oxygen from our very lungs and ears. ) and. Assuming for a moment a bifurcated scheme of what is and isn’t evil, - which can produce problematic ethical systems -clearly man’s nature cannot be exaustively characterized by one or the other.

Good (shall we forget?) is evil (when correctly defined!).


In the choice between good and evil there’s always a good creation science method of determining the nature of man.
(2pi-4Xpi+68pi)/[(1-2X+34)p], the answer is two, therefore

1. Good
2. Evil

We choose two, which is evil, therefore man is scientifically evil, QED.

[ June 04, 2002: Message edited by: Synaesthesia ]</p>
 
Old 06-04-2002, 10:42 PM   #10
h
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: florida
Posts: 17
Post

I'm sorry, but what the fuck are we actually talking about here?
h is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.