FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-27-2003, 01:50 PM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Talking Biblical Errancy and Inspiration

This site has some nice discussions of Biblical errancy. But I've come up with a theological "explanation" for it.

This errancy was divinely inspired by the Biblical God in order to indicate that much of the Bible ought to be interpreted allegorically instead of literally. Yes, it was deliberate.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 05-27-2003, 02:03 PM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: midwest usa
Posts: 1,203
Default Sounds like

deception and fraud to me.

I think God should be put on trial for fraud like those enron execs,if it proven that Gods fraud was deliberate and not incompetance.
mark9950 is offline  
Old 05-27-2003, 02:25 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 7,351
Default Re: Biblical Errancy and Inspiration

Quote:
Originally posted by lpetrich
This site has some nice discussions of Biblical errancy. But I've come up with a theological "explanation" for it.

This errancy was divinely inspired by the Biblical God in order to indicate that much of the Bible ought to be interpreted allegorically instead of literally. Yes, it was deliberate.
If God wanted to do that, don't you think it would have been more sensible to say explicitly that the stories are to be taken allegorically instead of literally? In fact, is does just that in some places for certain stories, as when "parables" are told. And that is highly suggestive that the remainder is NOT to be taken metaphorically (or allegorically).

Basically, if the Bible were the word of a god, and if that god wanted people to take it all allegorically instead of literally, then that god showed great incompetence in conveying the message. So it must be a really stupid god.
Pyrrho is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 06:24 AM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the holler, y'all
Posts: 243
Cool

Hey, isn't this exactly what Paul said? When he was faced with the need to tie the new Christianity he was proselytizing to the ancient established religion of Judaism in order to give Christianity some merit in the hearts of the people, he decided that God was speaking allegorically when speaking of Abraham's descendants-He didn't mean literal, physical bloodline relatives, he meant "spiritual" descendents. Then Paul asserted that Jesus was this "spiritual" descendent of Abraham-and thus Jesus was the Messiah, and the Christians could now claim ownership of thousands of years of Jewish scripture.

Pretty slick!!
Rushianbeing is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 06:25 AM   #5
CJD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
Default

May I suggest removing your collective heads out of your Western asses?
CJD is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 07:08 AM   #6
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the holler, y'all
Posts: 243
Default

Aww, sounds like someone's upset....
Rushianbeing is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 07:25 AM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 6,004
Default

The last thread I read was Omphalos and respect in E&C. Omphalos is yong earth creationism with "the appearance of old age". Its getting harder to distinguish God from Satan these days...
BioBeing is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 07:34 AM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by CJD
May I suggest removing your collective heads out of your Western asses?
For what reason?
lpetrich is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 09:26 AM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

This errancy was divinely inspired by the Biblical God in order to indicate that much of the Bible ought to be interpreted allegorically instead of literally. Yes, it was deliberate.

I have to second Pyrrho on this. It makes God out to be an idiot. Allegory is only affective as a form of communication if it is recognized as being such. If it is not then the Allegorist is a poor communicator, and therefore imperfect. This imperfection in communication shows that the bible was just the work of some less than perfect guys and not a perfect God. The responsibility of being correctly understood is that of the person doing the communicating and not the audience. So you can't use the standard Christian claim of the rest of us being imperfect to cover this.
The "allegories" that come to mind that IMO best illustrate this are the ridiculous physical descriptions of the Earth and Space in Genesis. The most learned and sincere biblical scholars in the world, for thousands of years, did not recognize these physical descriptions as being allegory. Speaking of Copernicus, Martin Luther wrote: "People give ear to an upstart astrologer who strove to show that the earth revolves, not the heavens or the firmament, the sun and the moon…This fool wishes to reverse the entire scheme of astrology; but sacred Scripture tells us that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, not the earth." John Calvin quoted the 93rd Psalm and then went on to ask: "Who will venture to place the authority of Copernicus above that of the Holy Spirit?" When Giordano Bruno did further work on that which Copernicus and was able to demonstrate that a rotating, orbiting Earth was an unassailable fact the Roman Inquisition burned him at the stake.
As well versed in the bible as Calvin, Luther and the College of Cardinals were they did not see the "allegory." By their words and actions they sincerely demonstrated their understanding that it was not allegorical.
The bible does not "become allegorical" until it is shown to be dead wrong. Pretty pathetic attempt at a "save."
God is either an imperfect fool or he, himself, is only an allegory.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 05-28-2003, 09:47 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampa Bay area
Posts: 3,471
Default

Of course, the story is that Martin Luther also liked to fart at the devil. Thought he was accomplishing something or other that way.
Rational BAC is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.