Clarice O'C

quote:

Originally posted by Clarice O'C:

I have one that I hope for an answer to.
If Jesus was God's son, who did God have
sex with?

Actually I wasn't at all clear with my original
message. I was asking about the God and Jesus
who were supposed to have existed before the
supposed creation. Who was Jesus' mother then?

G'day,
Clarice

Amos

Correct alli. In Gen.1 the essence of existence was created but without a corporeal body. It is just the blueprint of man in the image of God with the potential to become either male or female needed for procreation. The beauty of this is that we can be co-creators with God as Gods while procreating man in the image of God. In other words, we are in charge of our destiny and therefore also of God.

So then in Gen. 2 it was Lord God in the material second cause who formed man and next gave rise to the soul when he seperated the womb of God to become the handmaiden of God and eternal bride of the Lord God. It is called the Tree on Life in the garden which itself is Lord God.

Amos

You were quite clear with your question but Lord God was not called Jesus until about 2000 years ago when Catholicism became a religious branch that was grafted into the old mythology of Judiasm. It can be said that Jesus was Lord God in the beginning if you remove all the fruits of Judaism from Jesus to make him man in the image of God and thus without the actual tree of Life that was formed afterwards to gain dominion. Dominion does not mean oppression but makes reference to a higher form of rational existence.

The Genesis of Judaism does not deal with the physical creation of the earth and mankind upon earth but just with the origen of the each man within the myth.

Oxymoron

So Adam and Eve, the first people, have kids: Cain and Able. And suddenly, Cain and Able can have kids themselves. With whom, exactly?

Xians blurt something inane like "incest wasn't a sin back then". I mean is this God fickle or what?

Hawkingfan

Why do you keep forcing this garbage down our throats, Amos? This ridiculous statement reminds me of when you said Christ's ego was crucified and not his body. Do you honestly think anyone takes you seriously? For one thing, the writers of the bible would have no clue as to what an "ego" is since the concept wasn't even invented until almost 1900 years later!! And that theory, conceived by Sigmund Freud, has been rejected!! Modern Psychology has changed it's perception of Freud's theories 30 years ago with the rise of cognitive therapy. It's now considered outdated nonsense, just like that goobledygook you keep shoveling.

Pseudonymph

~snip~


Thanks for the info and correction Don.

Oh and BTW I'll soon be responding to your points in the other thread in BC&A I started a few days ago.

Thanks for being patient, I've just been busy.

Born Free

Womanity Amos Womanity

Amos

Holy shit Hawkinfan, are you ever shallow.

Do you really think that Frued invented our ego? It is really a shame that Freud's theory was ever accepted and it should be no less a shame that psychology, including cognitive therapy, is accepted as a modern science today.

The ego (persona) was created in Gen.3 when shame first became part of our humors. To see this compare the shame/no shame juxtaposition of Gen.2:25 and Gen.3:7.

Oh, and I never wrote that Christ's ego was crucified but the ego of Joseph was crufified here presented under the name of Jesus.

Hawkingfan

There is no such thing as an ego, Anus. Freud thought there was. He was wrong.

Hawkingfan

I know you are but what am I?

No one cares what you think. We are sick of your malarkey. This is your opinion. I'll believe modern science over your crap any day of the week. The only reason anyone answers you is to show what a moron you are. But your nonsense speaks for itself. I agree with whoever said we should just pat you on the head and move on whenever you present your bullshit.

Whatever.