FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-24-2002, 06:27 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,440
Post

Keep the ideas coming - if anything happens, it'll be in the summer when I am free of studies. I'll post ideas on a website (not here, because its far too public). I might do a couple of chapters or a synopsis for fun, and then see if it is worth continuing.
liquid is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 06:29 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,440
Post

Keep the ideas coming - if anything happens, it'll be in the summer when I am free of studies. I'll post ideas on a website (not here, because its far too public). I might do a couple of chapters or a synopsis for fun, and then see if it is worth continuing.
liquid is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 07:04 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 1,844
Wink

How will you approach spelling?

Wiil you have alot of mispelt words?

(my software won't even let me type 'alot', it keeps inserting a space!, I had to remove the space after I pasted my message into the "post a reply" box.
hyzer is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 07:05 AM   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 8,473
Post

It would damage evolution as much - if not more - as it would damage creationism.

They would merely create a huge fuss about it, pointing out that the deception was typical of evil fraudsters who were trying to foist a fraudulent science on the world's children, and for the first time they would have a hard example to show to the waiverers.

I abhor any risk of damage to science's credibility.
Nialler is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 07:43 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Nashville, USA
Posts: 949
Thumbs up

It should be really easy to do for the following reasons;

1) All your references will be to Bible passages.
2) You won't need to have it peer reviewed.
3) No scientific support is necessary. The underlying premise for the entire book can be "The Bible tells us..." and "With God, all things are possible."
4) You get to make stuff up out of thin air like "I think God put those dinosaur bones in the sediment to give us something to play with." <img src="graemlins/banghead.gif" border="0" alt="[Bang Head]" /> (actually said to me once)
5) You'll make a mint since xians love buying books that reinforce the fairy tale they believe.

[ January 24, 2002: Message edited by: MOJO-JOJO ]</p>
MOJO-JOJO is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 11:10 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 178
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Pandora:
<strong>Sounds like a good idea.

I don’t know how difficult it would be to get it published, but to become an acclaimed “expert” in Creationism seems pretty easy to me. You just have to fork out a few thousand dollars and a few weeks work for your doctorate.

</strong>
Which universities? Harvard, Berkley, UCLA, Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Switzerland, Brown U.??? I just read a few of the schools from ICR's list. It doesn't make much sense to me to make blanket statements (sometimes sarcastic like this instance) about scientists who believe in creation when it only applies to an extremely small minority. (I don't know if you can count them on ten fingers.)
ex-robot is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 12:54 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1,128
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by liquid:
<strong>That's good advice Faded! After all, the mighty LORD may well smite me for my arrogance and deceit.</strong>
I was more concerned that you might be remembered as a real creationist for all of posterity

fG
faded_Glory is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 04:38 PM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 292
Post

Heh, I had that same idea. Just write a bunch of crap in a book, make it sound scientific, and make a bunch of statements praising Jesus and the Bible. Presto! Then, after it gets acclaim by the Creationist community (especially ICR or AiG), admit you're really an evolutionist and have a book that refutes the first book already written and ready to be published. I wonder how many Creationists who read and loved the first book would touch the second?
Atheist121 is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 05:11 PM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 226
Post

Great minds think alike! I've also wanted to do something like this for easy cash, but I've never been unethical enough to actually do it. Writing like a fundy makes me sick.

All you have to do is come up with some crazy new idea and have it central to the book, and include a bunch of the usual claptrap as fillers. The crazy new idea can be anything as long as it sounds mathematical. They'll eat it up with a spoon (ala Dembski, ReMine, Behe, etc.)
CodeMason is offline  
Old 01-24-2002, 07:49 PM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Bangkok & Hong Kong
Posts: 55
Post

Let's think up some good names that will really help it sell.

1. Darwin's Mistress's Black Box (a la Behe)
2. Eve's Boobs and Adam's Balls (a la Gould)
3. The Genesis Covenant (a la Ludlum)
4. Bag of Fake Fossil Bones (a la King)
Icky is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.