FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2002, 06:38 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
Post Mouth shape

Just wondering something. We all know that natural selection has given birds a wide variety of beak shapes, depending on the kind of food they eat. So why are most mammals' mouths shaped the same? Almost all mammals have a wide mouth that curves upwards a bit and opens to about sixty degrees. The only exceptions I can think of are primates, whales, and anteaters. Why aren't mammals' mouths shaped differently?
Ojuice5001 is offline  
Old 11-27-2002, 06:50 AM   #2
pz
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Ojuice5001:
<strong>Just wondering something. We all know that natural selection has given birds a wide variety of beak shapes, depending on the kind of food they eat. So why are most mammals' mouths shaped the same? Almost all mammals have a wide mouth that curves upwards a bit and opens to about sixty degrees. The only exceptions I can think of are primates, whales, and anteaters. Why aren't mammals' mouths shaped differently?</strong>
The variation in mammals that is equivalent to the variation in birds' beaks is found in their teeth. We mammals have remarkably diverse teeth, as any comparative zoologist will tell you. In fact, for most mammals, all you need is a few teeth in order to classify them to at least the genus or family level.

I don't understand your claim that there is little variation in the mouths of mammals, though. Compare a cow and a wolf. Ever seen a naked mole rat? The bones of a saber-tooth tiger?
pz is offline  
Old 11-27-2002, 06:51 AM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: St Louis area
Posts: 3,458
Post

I guess because they do the job well enough.
MortalWombat is offline  
Old 11-27-2002, 04:57 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 1,230
Post

Ojuice5001:

In addition to pz's point regarding the fact that there's actually quite a lot of variation in mammals' mouths, and in their teeth in particular, I'd like to point out that birds don't have forelimbs with which they can manipulate their food.

Lacking manipulative forelimbs, birds must have bills with which they can adroitly manipulate their food.

Cheers,

Michael

[ November 27, 2002: Message edited by: The Lone Ranger ]</p>
The Lone Ranger is offline  
Old 11-27-2002, 09:07 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Nouveau-Brunswick
Posts: 507
Post

Consider the variation in the more analogous mammalian nose. Better yet, consider the variation within our own species.
parkdalian is offline  
Old 11-27-2002, 09:11 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Post

Quote:
Consider the variation in the more analogous mammalian nose.
Why is our nose 'more' analogous to a beak than our teeth and jaws??
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 11-28-2002, 02:24 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Why, because they're both sort of triangular of course! *chuckle*
tronvillain is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.