Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-05-2003, 10:10 AM | #1 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 279
|
Could one, in theory, clone a human just from a cheek cell?
Does a cheek cell contain all the necessary information such that, with advanced enough technology, a whole human could besult from one? Or are embryo cells needed?
Any links on this would be much appreciated! |
03-05-2003, 11:29 AM | #2 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
|
Re: Could one, in theory, clone a human just from a cheek cell?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
03-05-2003, 11:34 AM | #3 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
|
But would the nucleus from a cheek cell, insterted into an egg cell in place of its nucleus, work? Or does the donor nucleus have to come from a certain kind of cell?
Aspiring sci fi writers want to know! |
03-05-2003, 01:57 PM | #4 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 330
|
The DNA from a cheek cell could be used, as it contains all the necessary information. I believe most of the cloning done so far from animals has used DNA from somatic cells and inserted it into the nucleus of an ovum. I would assume that you would need to use the nucleus of the ovum, but I am no expert in the field. If the egg cell's nucleus is specialized for the development of the embryo, then you probably couldn't use the cheek cell nucleus, as it would lack that specialization. Check back with me in a few years when I will have my bio degree; maybe I know for sure by then
|
03-05-2003, 02:44 PM | #5 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Amman, Jordan
Posts: 258
|
Quote:
|
|
03-05-2003, 04:59 PM | #6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
As has been pointed out, a cheek cell has all of the information necessary to create a clone, at least if we assume that the "advanced technology" can make the necessary modifications to the DNA.
|
03-05-2003, 05:20 PM | #7 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 3,341
|
Quote:
|
|
03-05-2003, 06:30 PM | #8 |
Moderator - Science Discussions
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Providence, RI, USA
Posts: 9,908
|
pz:
an epithelial cell does not contain sufficient information. An epithelial cell nucleus + the cytoplasm/membranes of an ovum does. The ovum might not necessarily have to be human, though. And strictly speaking, wouldn't the chemical environment of the uterus where the fertilized ovum develops be a necessary component of the "information" needed to clone a human? If the details of this environment were lost forever, future nonhuman scientists might not be able to reconstruct a human, even if they had a supply of frozen human egg cells. But perhaps the uterus of a related mammal would be close enough, just as the ovum of another mammal might be close enough for implanting the DNA. |
03-06-2003, 01:16 AM | #9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
pz:
Quote:
|
|
03-06-2003, 01:21 AM | #10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 173
|
Wasn't Dolly the Sheep cloned by taking DNA from her "mother"'s udder and inserting it into an empty ovum?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|