FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-2003, 07:11 PM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orion Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 3,092
Default Kansas has an Anti-evolution bill

Kansas has a new anti-evolution bill though it appears that is unlikely to suceed. Still those in Kansas should express your displeasure.

Bill could allow teaching of creationism
Valentine Pontifex is offline  
Old 02-10-2003, 07:43 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Default

Quote:
Though the bill doesn't explicitly mention evolution or creation science, it does require schools to "encourage the presentation of scientific evidence supporting the origins of life and its diversity, objectively and without religious, naturalistic or philosophic bias or assumption." The bill also would prohibit schools from punishing teachers who deviated from curriculum requirements.
That is so tricksy. These things just keep getting subtler and subtler. If you didn't know what to look for this might seem like a mighty good idea, until you realise what it actually means.

Funnily enough, unlike other bills that specify something like intelligent desighn, this one seeks only to remove the safeguards that stop teachers from teaching all kinds of wacky stuff. This would allow the teaching of raelianism as much as it woud creationism.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 02-10-2003, 08:06 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Default

How the hell can you teach science without a "naturalistic" bias? That's like teaching trig without a "mathematical" bias.
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 02-10-2003, 08:10 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
How the hell can you teach science without a "naturalistic" bias?
Wouldn't teaching with an emphasis on empirical observation and parsimony produce the exact same results, even without assuming naturalism? Or are empiricism and parsimony considered naturalistic assumtions themselves?
Doubting Didymus is offline  
Old 02-10-2003, 08:25 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Doubting Didymus
Or are empiricism and parsimony considered naturalistic assumtions themselves?
Yes.
RufusAtticus is offline  
Old 02-10-2003, 08:27 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Yes.
Really? Okay, screw that.
Doubting Didymus is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:08 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.