FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-29-2003, 10:59 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
Default Christians: How Did You Decide

to NOT be a Hindu?

What arguments did you use to reject it?

I'm really interested in specifically what criteria are valid for rejecting a religion. I'm sure you all have well-developed senses of criteria because you have honestly explored other religions before rejecting them. You may ask how I know this and it's because you cheerfully and innocently believe (in general) that if we just examined your religion we would not be able to find reasons to reject it as false. So, it follows that you have clear and well-traveled criteria for How to Honestly and Reasonably Reject a Religion.


Please share the process!
Rhea is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 02:00 PM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Africa
Posts: 2,194
Default

*bump*

I'm curious whether any believers here have given this any thought
Farren is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 02:36 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,578
Default

Well, I am a Christian because I was raised this way, and my experiences match what I would expect if what I believed was correct. Probably Hindus remain Hindus for the same reason.

Why search for a new "truth" when the old one works for you? I see no reason to change my worldview when the way it currently stands, since my needs are met. When my worldview (including religious views) no longer meets my needs, it will change--as it has changed (albeit slightly) before.

So, I would guess that valid criteria for rejecting/accepting a religion is whether it meets your needs (whatever they may be) IMO. I'm sure that this is different for many people, but that within a specific culture many people have similar needs and therefore find that the dominant worldview(including religion) meets their needs.

--tibac
wildernesse is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 02:48 PM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by wildernesse
Well, I am a Christian because I was raised this way, and my experiences match what I would expect if what I believed was correct. Probably Hindus remain Hindus for the same reason.
Then why do hindus burn in hell for eternity, just because they were raised different?

But your right, the different "truths" work for different people.
Paperstreet is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 02:50 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Paperstreet
Then why do hindus burn in hell for eternity, just because they were raised different?

But your right, the different "truths" work for different people.
I don't know that they do, and don't say so. After I die, who knows what is "next"--if anything.

--tibac
wildernesse is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 02:56 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Boxing ring of HaShem, Jesus and Allah
Posts: 1,945
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by wildernesse
Well, I am a Christian because I was raised this way, and my experiences match what I would expect if what I believed was correct. Probably Hindus remain Hindus for the same reason.


Is truth determined by the facts of your birth?

Quote:

Why search for a new "truth" when the old one works for you? I see no reason to change my worldview when the way it currently stands, since my needs are met. When my worldview (including religious views) no longer meets my needs, it will change--as it has changed (albeit slightly) before.


Is truth determined pragmatically, ie by how well it works?

You seem to imply "Christianity is true for me, and Hinduism is true for the Hindu". But that means truth is relative. I thought Christian theists were against this notion. "Christianity true for everyone, and all else false for everyone", so I learned.
emotional is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 03:09 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by wildernesse
I don't know that they do, and don't say so. After I die, who knows what is "next"--if anything.

--tibac
I assumed you saw the parody in my comment. I don't say so, the bible, and followers of Christianity do.
Paperstreet is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 04:13 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
Default

Atheist(thinking):
Ha, Not many Christians posted here. I got them! They are admitting they are brainless sheep. BWAH HA HA HA!
GOTCHA! Christians!
GeoTheo is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 04:22 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 6th Circle of Hell
Posts: 1,093
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GeoTheo
Atheist(thinking):
Ha, Not many Christians posted here. I got them! They are admitting they are brainless sheep. BWAH HA HA HA!
GOTCHA! Christians!
Lol, nice non-answer
Spaz is offline  
Old 04-29-2003, 04:24 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 7,116
Default

Quote:
Lol, nice non-answer
I'd say...
christ-on-a-stick is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:13 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.