FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-26-2003, 07:27 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Suzanne**Atheist
I'm sure glad my husband and I are atheists! We don't want to be siblings in heaven. We'd be happier having sex in hell.


That "brothers and sisters in Christ" thing is creepy. Just like all the nasty incestuous bible relationships. Yuck.
Unfortunately you won't be having sex in Hell. God provided sex within a marriage bond. Hell is punishment - therefore getting to have sex won't be involved in Hell's eternal torment. But make fun all you want.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:29 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rational BAC
So far not a single verse from anybody saying anything about what Heaven is supposed to be like. Don't think there are any Biblical references on the subject.

If no Biblical rebutal----then I will continue to believe mucho sex going on in Heaven. Orgasms galore.

I don't know where Fundies get these very detailed ideas about things that are not described in any way in the Bible. Very vivid imaginations I guess.

And of course they are also probably following a personal disposition. I guess if you think sex is nasty personally on Earth, then no way would you want it in your own personally contrived Heaven.

To each his own. I plan to have a whole bunch of sex in Heaven.
The Bible briefly talks about Heaven, but Jesus mentions Hell more because He wants you to avoid it.

Quote:
To each his own. I plan to have a whole bunch of sex in Heaven.
Have you accepted Jesus as your Lord and Savior and asked Him into your life? From your posts on this board, i doubt it - therefore you probably won't be in Heaven ( although God will make that decision).
Magus55 is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:30 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default Re: Re: No marriage in Heaven?

Quote:
Originally posted by Lel
Note that not all Christians believe that marriage is not eternal; Latter-Day Saints believe that marriage can be eternal.
Latter Day Saints, aka Mormons - is cultic, and are usually considered outside of Christianity - they are hardly the people to go by.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:32 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
The Bible briefly talks about Heaven, but Jesus mentions Hell more because He wants you to avoid it.
A better way would be for Jesus to convince his father to abolish hell altogether and use a different form of justice that actually fits the crime.

Quote:
Latter Day Saints, aka Mormons - is cultic, and are usually considered outside of Christianity - they are hardly the people to go by.
Lots of Xian denominations also act like cults - collection plates, rituals, etc. But I suppose they're not TRUE cults.
winstonjen is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:32 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Calzaer
Why would an all-loving God ORDER us to do something so disgusting, and make it feel good even though it's evil and sinful and disgusting? Must be another test!
Sex within in a marriage isn't disgusting. Whats disgusting is wanting sex above other things in a sinless, holy paradise. I'd rather worship and love God for eternity, then have sex. You may enjoy it constantly, but thats your sinful side.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:34 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by winstonjen
A better way would be for Jesus to convince his father to abolish hell altogether and use a different form of justice that actually fits the crime.
Anything but Hell wouldn't be righteous judgement, and Hell does fit the crime for disobeying and sinning against God. Just because you don't think so doesn't make it wrong. God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than you.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:36 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mecca777
As an atheist, I'm only looking forward to another forty or fifty years of sex. Is that less disgusting, since my expectation of sex is finite; or more disgusting, since I don't accept that I'll be punished forever and ever for enjoying the nerve endings and hormones that god provided?
Not accepting something doesn't make it true. Apparently you know enough knowledge of the universe to determine that you have nothing to worry about. Me however, not being arrogant enough to think i know every possibility in the entire universe, don't want to take my chances. I have faith God is real, if im wrong - big deal. As if ill care in the ground.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:37 PM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Anything but Hell wouldn't be righteous judgement, and Hell does fit the crime for disobeying and sinning against God. Just because you don't think so doesn't make it wrong. God >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than you.
Saying that you think it's what your god thinks it's right doesn't make it right either.

Does disbeliving in the President of the USA also warrant eternal punishment? If not, then you have double standards.

And if we're all deserving of death, why not kill everyone now and save your deity the trouble? I'm sure you'll be rewarded for that.

And if you're so concerned about the 'age of accountability', why not kill all newborns and abort all pregnant women so that the kids can go to heaven? Or would you prefer to risk them burning in hell?
winstonjen is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:38 PM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 3,425
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Not accepting something doesn't make it true. Apparently you know enough knowledge of the universe to determine that you have nothing to worry about. Me however, not being arrogant enough to think i know every possibility in the entire universe, don't want to take my chances. I have faith God is real, if im wrong - big deal. As if ill care in the ground.
Pascal's Wager, AGAIN! What if some other religion is right? You'd be a hypocrite if you didn't believe in them all to be on the safe side.
winstonjen is offline  
Old 05-26-2003, 07:42 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by winstonjen
Saying that you think it's what your god thinks it's right doesn't make it right either.

Does disbeliving in the President of the USA also warrant eternal punishment? If not, then you have double standards.

And if we're all deserving of death, why not kill everyone now and save your deity the trouble? I'm sure you'll be rewarded for that.

And if you're so concerned about the 'age of accountability', why not kill all newborns and abort all pregnant women so that the kids can go to heaven? Or would you prefer to risk them burning in hell?
First of all, what does the president have to do with anything?

Second, God said not to murder - therefore why would I do it?Third, i don't know the fate of anyone, including children, by killing newborns, i could be preventing that person from finding the cure for cancer, or bringing 100's to Christ. Only God knows our fate, He and He alone has the right to take life, we don't.
Magus55 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:04 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.